Shelia Carroll ~ 15 States Have Filed A Petition To Secede From The United States

Govt Slaves | November 11 2012 | Orig. Source

Barack ObamaAs of Saturday November 10, 2012, 15 States have petitioned the Obama Administration for withdrawal from the United States of America in order to create its own government.

States following this action include: Louisiana, Texas, Montana, North Dakota, Indiana, Mississippi, Kentucky, North Carolina, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, New Jersey, Colorado, Oregon and New York. These States have requested that the Obama Administration grant a peaceful withdrawal from the United States.

These petitions were filed just days after the 2012 Presidential election.

Louisiana was the first State to file a petition a day after the election by a Michael E. from Slidell, Louisiana. Texas was the next State to follow by a Micah H. from Arlington, Texas.

The government allows one month from the day the petition is submitted to obtain 25,000 signatures in order for the Obama administration to consider the request.

The Texas petition reads as follows:

The US continues to suffer economic difficulties stemming from the federal government’s neglect to reform domestic and foreign spending. The citizens of the US suffer from blatant abuses of their rights such as the NDAA, the TSA, etc. Given that the state of Texas maintains a balanced budget and is the 15th largest economy in the world, it is practically feasible for Texas to withdraw from the union, and to do so would protect its citizens’ standard of living and re-secure their rights and liberties in accordance with the original ideas and beliefs of our founding fathers which are no longer being reflected by the federal government.

As of 12:46 am, Sunday, signatures obtained by Louisiana, 7,358; Texas, 3,771; Florida, 636; Georgia, 475; Alabama, 834; North Carolina, 792; Kentucky, 467; Mississippi, 475; Indiana, 449; North Dakota, 162; Montana, 440; Colorado, 324; Oregon, 328; New Jersey, 301 and New York, 169. Many more States are expected to follow.

A petition is not searchable at WhiteHouse.gov until 150 signatures have been obtained. It is the originator’s responsibility to obtain these signatures.

The Texas petition can be reviewed and/or signed by clicking here.

16 thoughts on “Shelia Carroll ~ 15 States Have Filed A Petition To Secede From The United States

    1. The people are simply using the mechanism provided by the White House to express their concerns about the wholesale destruction of America by banksters, corporations, Executive Orders, TSA, NDAA, Fast ‘n Furious, HAARP, chemtrails, etc. I’m glad that, in addition to this CLEAR STATEMENT by the American people that they do NOT wish to be part of this type of union, that there does indeed exist LEGAL mechanisms to secede. The government masquerading as the gov’t of the American people is NOT a gov’t for, by and of the people. It’s a gov’t for, by, and of the banksters. I for one am delighted to see the people signing up with such alacrity to express their disapproval. Blessings~G

  1. Will Obama use NDAA To Arrest State Representatives and State Militias that support Secession?
    Could Obama use NDAA To Arrest Secessionists on the Premise members are Militants and Belligerents that pose a threat to National Security?
    Recently the Obama administration stated to Federal Judge Katherine Forest that under (NDAA) The National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 the President had authorization to lock up belligerents indefinitely. That they (were justified) to lock belligerents up indefinitely—because cases involving belligerents directly-aligned with militants against the good of America—warrants such punishment.) Pres. Obama could use NDAA provisions to order U.S. Military Forces to round up without evidence, millions of Americans including Secessionists and Militias by alleging they are belligerents or a threat to National Security. Many observers believe Obama intends to extend NDAA to imprison U.S. Citizens in Indefinite Detention not involved with or associated with enemy forces.
    Hitler included similar provisions in his fascist (Discriminatory Decrees signed February 28, 1933). Almost immediately after the German Parliament passed Hitler’s laws, the Reich Government ordered the arrest of German Citizens and confiscated their guns without probable cause or evidence; delegated powers to German Police and other authorities to arrest anyone Nazi authorities claimed attempted or incited public unrest: arrested among others were outspoken Germans, writers, journalists, peaceful protestors and artists. After World War II the East German Secret Police (Stasi) used the threat of Indefinite Detention to forcibly recruit thousands of informants.
    The U.S. 2012 NDAA legislation Obama signed 12-31-11 is similar to Hitler’s 1933 fascist laws the SS and Gestapo used to target persons in Germany for arrest, imprisonment and execution without probable cause; and confiscate millions of dollars of property. Hitler used his laws to suspend Parliament and the Supreme Court insuring his laws could not be rescinded.
    During the Obama Administration’s recent request for a (stay) to stop U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest blocking enforcement of vague NDAA provisions, the Obama Administration—never clarified what constitutes a (belligerent); or militant; or what belligerent activities (directly aligned with a militant) to order a belligerent’s arrest or indefinite detention; or what is against the good of America. Under vague provisions of NDAA, the President could accuse anyone of being (directly aligned with militants by way of any political or other association; activity, statement, writing or communication with an individual or group government deemed (militant) to arrest and indefinitely detain Americans. Writers, journalists, Americans that disagree with or question U.S. Government or its allies—may under NDAA be subject to arrest and indefinite detention.
    NDAA 2012, like Hitler’s 1933 Discriminatory Decrees enforces censorship; refers to the Patriot Act e.g. warrant-less searches of private property and forfeiture of property from persons not charged with crime. Provisions in NDAA 2012 keep the door open for corrupt U.S. police; government agents and provocateurs which there are many, to falsify reports and statements to target any American, group or organization for arrest, indefinite detention, complete disappearance; civil asset forfeiture of their property.
    You may have noted NDAA referred to the USA Patriot Act. The Patriot Act lends itself to Government / police corruption; the Federal Government may use secret witnesses and informants to cause arrests and civil asset forfeiture of Americans’ property. Witness(s) and informants may be paid up to 50% of assets forfeited. Federal Government under 18USC may use a mere preponderance of civil evidence, little more than hearsay to Civilly Forfeit Private Property. Under the Patriot Act innocent property owners may be barred by government knowing the evidence federal government uses to forfeit their property.
    Sections of NDAA 2012 are so broad, it appears U.S. Government or the President could (retroactively) deem an American’s past 1st Amendment activities prior to passage of 2012 NDAA—supported hostilities, terrorism or (Belligerents) to order the arrest and Indefinite Detention of any U.S. Citizen, writer, group or organization.

    Under NDAA 2012 it should be expected that indefinitely detained U.S. Citizens not involved in terrorism or hostile activities, not given Miranda Warnings when interrogated, not allowed legal counsel or habeas corpus may be prosecuted for non-terrorist (ordinary crimes) because of their (alleged admissions) while held in Indefinite Detention.

    1. Hi RWolf, it is certainly a possibility that the NDAA will be used to imprison Americans who desire to live under an American Constitution & Declaration of Independence and not 900+ Executive Orders signed by Obama, the majority of which override the American Constitution & Declaration of Independence

  2. I consider that if this was an overall honest gesture based on true difficulties stemming from the federal government’s neglect to reform domestic and foreign spending as their petition states …

    Such a petition would have been filed no later than the Bush administration …

    I really feel for many, this is more of a prejudice issue … as many of these states are among the most prejudice of hearts of all states … as such a report HERE http://www.the-top-tens.com/lists/most-racists-states-us.asp will verify …

    Nevertheless … I would be for the lands of these states to be given back to the Indians and Mexicans which they were stolen from …

    But greater priorities set before humanity during these end of days than their continued darken hearts of prejudice and bickering over surface crust that will soon grow so hot it will peel away and join the asteroid belt …

  3. These states should have made sure the proper candidates were elected. Now they have what they voted in, so cecedng from the Union is thoughtless. Keep your congressmen focused as to why they are where they are, and maybe we can be a strong Union!

  4. Disassembling the states is a fabulous idea but about the last thing I want to do is tell the White House I am a traitor to the Union and hand them my name and address on a platter. Or am I being paranoid? The name Bradley Manning comes to mind….

  5. Thank you, Gillian 🙂 I would like to see this happen. Wonder if the east coast has been left to suffer due to this petition.

    1. I don’t think so. The ineptitude of FEMA is likely to blame, along with that hairbrained rule that disallowed non-union workers to assist with electricity, and a mayor who turns away bagels sent with love from caring synagogues. Blessings, G

    2. I went to the site to read the petition. I clicked the petition link on the site and when the page came up it said thank you for signing our petition. I didn’t sign it. 🙂 Any idea how to correct this? I was only trying to read it. While I may agree with much of it, it doesn’t mean I would sign the petition. I have never had this happen with a petition before.

      1. Hi Bella, if you didn’t fill in any info – simply clicked on the link to the petition – then you have not signed the petition. I wouldn’t worry too much about it. Blessings, G

      2. =) Thank you, Gillian. I’m not worried about it. I sign many petitions every day and this has never happened. I found it rather odd. Many strange things are happening. Ahhhh, this may have to do with the 2 timelines and we on top of that we are jumping back and forth in frequencies. doh!!! lol I’ve seen things posted that change on occasion in the past week. So, I guess anything is possible now. Have a good night, sweetie.

Please leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.