Simon Black ~ What Use Can We Really Be After Capital Controls Or A Currency Crisis?

SovereignMan June 11 2013

It’s one of the hardest habits to break.

We begin pledging our allegiance to the state before we even know what that means. We learn to sing bombastic, patriotic songs of praise at an age when we don’t understand the vocabulary of the lyrics.

And after years of repetition and social reinforcement, the idealistic devotion to country becomes profoundly ingrained in our personalities.

It’s a lifelong indoctrination underpinned by a deep instinct to belong to something greater than ourselves.

Human beings are not meant to exist in isolation. We strive for inclusion and acceptance of our peers. And the forming of social groups, whether families, tribes, dynasties, and kingdoms is as old as human civilization itself.

Over the centuries, though, the social constructs have changed dramatically. It used to be closely knit, smaller groups with shared values and dedication to the other members. Now our loyalty is manipulated towards a political union… and the government which represents it.

In other words, we’re inculcated to have an unquestioning allegiance to the system.

The combination is so powerful that even in the face of overwhelming evidence, the sentiment is difficult to shake.

It’s clear now that the system has turned on the very people who invest their faith and confidence in it.

We can see the obvious effects of decades of morbidly destructive policy.

We can see how the way of life we grew up with has become a distant memory, replaced by a cheap masquerade.

We can see the debt, the money printing, the police state, the utter collapse of justice and rule of law… and the shiny facade of mindless entertainment and wanton consumerism as an attempt to cover it all up.

And yet… it’s still so hard to turn one’s back. Deep within ourselves there’s still a quiet voice that says “This can be fixed. It’s going to get better.”

Continue reading

Paul Rosenberg ~ Government Against The People: It Gets Worse In The Late Stages

freemansperspective June 6 2013

All governments – communist, capitalist, fascist, monarchy, theocracy, whatever – survive on the skim. They take money from productive people, by force or threat of force. However prettied-up or justified this fact may be, it remains the central fact of rulership.

It’s a simple but disturbing truth: A late-stage state’s modus operandi must always be “government against the people” – an MO that is inherently predatory. And it’s not because the participants are all sociopaths (though many are).

At most times, governments try very hard to skim quietly, as with payroll taxes, where the producer’s money is taken away before he or she ever holds it in their hands. That’s also why tariffs were a traditional tax – the average person never saw it, and didn’t feel violated.

But when governments are massively over-extended, they lose the luxury of the quiet skim and become more aggressive. This is simply what happens in long-established, monopolistic institutions, like governments. They spend wildly to make themselves look good, then find they need more money. Not willing to cut their spending, they have two choices:

  1. Debasement of the currency, which they always do first. But this trick never works for very long, since people do engage their minds when conducting commerce and adjust their prices to counteract the debasement.
  2. Squeeze the producers dry, any way they can.

The Problem of Legitimacy

Continue reading

American Fascism: Ralph Nader Decries How Big Business Has Taken Control Of The U.S. Government [Video]

Democracy Now June 4 2013

Describing the United States as an “advanced Third World country,” longtime consumer advocate and former presidential candidate Ralph Nader calls for a new mass movement to challenge the power corporations have in Washington. “It is not too extreme to call our system of government now ‘American fascism.’ It’s the control of government by big business, which Franklin Delano Roosevelt defined in 1938 as fascism,” Nader says.

Continue reading

James Hall ~ Refuse To Buy Or Sell With The Federal Government

BATR March 13 2013

That infamous mark of the beast is a regular condition of doing business with the federal government. How long have we gone, and how far we have strayed, from simple barter for trade transactions. The mercantilism that exists today, based upon the premise that our “Washington Godfather”, is our silent partner in occupational endeavors, has failed miserably. According to the system, the government makes an offer you cannot refuse. However, is this really the plight of rational and creative citizens determined to maintain their personal dignity and financial integrity?

If only, there was an easy and uncomplicated method for boycotting any business with the federal government. While many may question the wisdom for refusing economic trade with one of the biggest customers on the planet, careful examination reveals that a grassroots level protest is one of the few pragmatic options left to influence the working of the existing state marriage with the corporatization economy. The media flagship of the cheer leadership globalist economic model, CNBC, seeks to promote strategies on How To Sell to the Federal Government

The crooked bailout of failed automobile manufacturers illustrates the intent of the federal government to collectivize industry under the banner of state technocrat control. The initial populace response from the  GM bailout triggers calls for boycott.

“Complicating matters, the bailout is triggering a harsh reaction from the conservative end of the political spectrum, with some high-profile pundits calling for an outright boycott of what many are calling “Government Motors.”

Continue reading

LaRouche ~ Webcast: Glass Steagall Now Or Else Hyperinflationary Bust! [Video]

LarouchePac February 15 2013 (Thanks, Gerald)

During a February 15th webcast, Lyndon LaRouche identified the solution required now to defend and protect the general welfare of all Americans, in the face of complete economic collapse.

One way or another, the system will be reorganized. Glass-Steagall is needed to defend the general welfare. Listen to Lyndon LaRouche’s address to the American people.

Alan Keyes ~ Gun Control Is Part Of A Plan To Kill Hundreds Of Thousands [Video]

RWWBlog February 6 2013

Alan Keyes says everyone knows society is on the verge of total lawless chaos and therefore any attempt at gun control is really an effort to render people defenseless so they’ll be slaughtered by the thousands.

Keyes is controversial. But hey! When you’re right, you’re right. ~G

Tyler Durden ~ The Vulnerability Of The Elites

Zerohedge January 31 2013 Thanks Kevin 

In a post-financial crisis world, the lack of viable international leadership is potentially troubling. In 2013, the WEF believes, this breakdown of international coordination will go increasingly local: in such a world, governments will focus more on their domestic agendas, which will create new risks in and of itself. Most importantly, the growing vulnerability of elites makes effective public and private leadership that much more difficult to sustain.

Leaders of all kinds are becoming more vulnerable to their constituents, generating more reactive and short-term governance. Whether one looks at the dismal approval ratings of the U.S. Congress or the impact that more open flows of information is having on the Chinese ruling elite, it is clear that people are becoming more and more uninspired by their governments. When it comes to unemployment, the widening disparity of wealth, or environmental degradation, highly complex or even intractable issues set politicians up for failure in the eyes of their constituents. Under performance erodes elites’ legitimacy, making it that much harder for them to lead effectively. Against this backdrop, a host of key 2013 risks and opportunities takes shape.

Read document Vulnerability Of The Elites

Mind Vine ~ Bitcoin: The World’s First Cryptographic Commodity

theintelhub.com February 3 2013

One result has repeated itself without fail throughout history. Every fiat currency ever created has dropped to zero and ended in horrible failure for the majority of its users, while benefiting those that destroy it. The reins of this economic self destruct mechanism are carefully tended by the worlds power structure while they position their own assets in such a way to profit from the fire sale as the rest of the world struggles to survive.

This pattern has repeated itself ever since the first cuneiform tablet was forged, just after the abstract concept of money was created. Since that time society relied completely on evolving technology to verify and preserve the institution of money as it was originally intended, and others continually worked to break that system for personal gain. Because this has been an expensive and complicated task in the past, people have always relied on a centralized institution to control the common wealth. This has always left people vulnerable to this central point of control being hijacked and used against the common wealth, until now.

The creation of Bitcoin is a historical landmark in the evolution of money. For the first time in human history there is a system of trade that is not under the control of a centralized system, and is in fact designed to prevent such controls. It also includes a few never before seen features enabling people to use publicly known open source mathematical calculations to ensure that the Bitcoin can only be spent once. A finite number of Bitcoins will be created, and the probability of generating them decreases as new users join the system. These are the key tenets of the Bitcoin system.

Continue reading

Obama Wants Your Guns, Homeland Security Says Defend Yourself With Scissors [Video]

FreedomOutpost.com | January 31, 2013

Apparently, “Defend yourself with a legal firearm” is not part of the new Department of Homeland Security curriculum.

They have now resorted to a training video that encourages you to use scissors to protect yourself in the event that you are a victim of a shooting.

Perhaps this is an upgrade from them instructing border patrol agents to run and hide.

Greg Hunter ~ CBS Anti-Constitution Network

USA Watchdog | January 30 2013

This past Sunday, CBS ran an op-ed segment on its morning show called, “Let’s give up on the Constitution.”   It was written and delivered by Georgetown law professor Louis Michael Seidman.  Professor Seidman gave a longer version of this in print at the end of 2012 in the New York Times.  There, he said, “As someone who has taught constitutional law for almost 40 years, I am ashamed it took me so long to see how bizarre all this is.”  Really, it took 40 years to see the light?  On the CBS version, Seidman said, “I’ve got a simple idea: Let’s give up on the Constitution.  I know, it sounds radical, but it’s really not.”  Really?  It’s not a radical idea when the President of the United States just swore an oath to “uphold the Constitution” in his second term inauguration?  (Click here for the CBS version of Seidman’s op-ed.)  (Click here for the NYT version.) 

I don’t question professor Seidman’s knowledge of constitutional law.  What I question is his timing and his new awakening after a “40 year” haze.  I also question the decision CBS made to put this op-ed on the air.  Not because of what was said, but because CBS put this on without any rebuttal.  I wholeheartedly disagree with Seidman’s view, but I am steadfastly in favor of the First Amendment.   To me, CBS is the anti-Constitution network for allowing a radical one-sided view to go unchecked!  After all, it’s not “Freedom of Spin.”   This is how a group of outdated TV stations takes care of the public trust?

As far as professor Seidman, he should be “ashamed” for the sham of being a constitutional scholar for  decades who doesn’t believe in his field of study.  In Seidman’s CBS op-ed, he says he’s “eager to talk with people” about gun control, but if he had his wish, the conversation would start with people having no right to have a gun.  Let’s talk—yeah, right.

Continue reading

Why are AR-15′s ‘Personal Defense’ Weapons for the DHS but ‘Assault Rifles’ for Citizens?

Activist Post | January 29 2013

“We are fast approaching the stage of ultimate inversion: the stage where government is free to do as it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission.” - Ayn Rand

Why are fully-automatic AR-15s with 30-round magazines and hollow-point bullets called ‘personal defense’ weapons when the Department of Homeland Security purchases them, but semi-auto AR-15s are assault rifles in the hands of citizens?

DHS Orders 7000 AR-15s – Wiki Image

The Department of Homeland Security filed a purchase bid this past June titled “Personal Defense Weapons Solicitation”.  It is combined bid for 5.56x45mm NATO ammunition and “select-fire firearm suitable for personal defense.”

Increasingly the government is giving itself privileges that they are taking away from citizens. This is becoming most obvious in regards to gun rights, but it’s becoming a widespread abuse of power across all aspects of society. The government is supposed to derive its authority from the people not the other way around.

Ron Paul recently addressed this exact topic proposing the simple solution: ”Anything the government assumes they have a right to do to us, we should assume we have a right to do that to them.”

Continue reading

Mike Krieger ~ The Money Powers VS. Silver, Gold & The People [Audio]

SGTbull07

Mike Krieger from Liberty Blitzkrieg joins us to talk about the perceived silver shortage – is it real, or just hysteria. Is Apple really having a hard time securing physical silver for fabrication?

We talk about the Central Banks and the world powers aligned against humanity, the fight for liberty and the Second Amendment – Liberty’s last line of defense.

View Part 2 here