Global Governance War For The Future! [Video]

Freedom Or SlaveryCatherine Austin Fitts –  “… when people say, ‘I’m not important.’ Wrong. You’re very important, because if you look where most of the money comes from, it comes from the political control you get, one county at a time and that means…you can harvest everybody and everything now why is it so important to me that every person listening to this can see the control grid that’s operating on you, because when you add CBDCs and Digital IDs – Bam!

That control grid goes from something that is hurting you and me and influencing you and me and tricking you and me to a digital concentration camp right we go from being herded to being under total and complete control to slavery. That’s a huge difference. Continue reading

Fabian Society: Pay For Permission To Use The Earth

Activist Post May 21 2013

Fabian Society
See the Fabian Society’s stained glass window, showing their prominent members molding the world closer to their image.

All would be ‘renters’ without ownership rights under this 1887 collectivist model.

In the founding creed of the Fabian Society, published circa 1887, the prestigious UK socialists behind the founding of the Labour Party set down principles against the private ownership of land and towards the formation of a global (socialist administered) commune.

In particular, the group – whose most notable members include playwright George Bernard Shaw and sci-fi writer H.G. Wells – says that people should “pay rent” for “permission to use the Earth.”

Clearly, this a forerunner to global governance institution who are today trying restrict individual rights in the name of saving the Earth while driving the masses into a global collective ruled by secretive societies of elite members.

The Fabian creed written in 1887 states:

Continue reading

Nicholas West ~ Council On Foreign Relations Plan For Global Governance In 2013

Activist Post | December 29 2012

Council of Councils Members

Brookings InstitutionIt is incredible that mention of a one-world government in many circles is still considered to be conspiracy talk. Fortunately, the global political awakening that arch-globalist Zbigniew Brzezinski has referred to is forcing ever-increasing justifications for their use of globalist language.

One would hope that a relatively new Council on Foreign Relations initiative that is expanding can lay to rest any debate about the desire to form a global government in the name of supposedly solving global problems.

The initiative called The Council of Councils was featured in a recent round table discussion of the central problems facing the world that they believe require multilateral cooperation. The discussions and recommendations released from this convention of experts is important to keep available the next time you hear the label conspiracy theorist hurled in your direction. The title of the round table was Challenges for Global Governance in 2013.

Just as we have seen from other think tanks such as the Project For a New American Century, The Royal Society, and the Brookings Institution, among others; their thoughts translate to reality on a less-than-coincidental frequency, so we would do well to listen to what they are saying.

The Council of Councils initiative was announced in March, 2012 and clearly identifies a strategy for forming alliances across a series of shared concerns as set forth by the CFR. It is important to note from the beginning that the CFR bills itself as non-partisan; and here is where the uninitiated can immediately be tripped up. Non-partisan sounds like a good thing, going beyond typical party divisions, while striking a note that rings of independence and an objective search for the truth.

However, when one understands that in their own words, “The founding membership of the Council of Councils includes leading institutions from nineteen countries, roughly tracking the composition of the Group of Twenty (G20),” we begin to get an inkling that their version of non-partisan means that they are flexible in their use of whatever political language is expedient to get results that go beyond any concept of nationalism.

The party of the CFR is the One World Party.

Continue reading