Why Greenland Is the Future of US Strategic Power

Trump’s Greenland Gambit Pays Off

Why Greenland Is the Future of US Strategic PowerPublicola – President Trump arrived in Davos with one item on his mind: Greenland. The goal was to make a bid for the ice-covered landmass, which is so valuable to the United States from both a geopolitical and financial standpoint.

At the crossroads of the Arctic, the great “piece of ice,” as our President endearingly labeled it, is situated at a crucial intersection for trade and military operations. It can provide a great strategic boost to any superpower which claims it, a reason for President Trump’s strong campaign to acquire it, and on the flipside of that, a reason for Chinese and Russian warships becoming an increasingly common sight off its coastline. Continue reading

How Trump Is Reshaping Global Power and Challenging the System

Playing Taps for the New World Order

Playing Taps for the New World OrderClarice Feldman – President Trump has the world playing taps for the New World Order, and that’s a good thing. In the process, he dealt the UK’s Keir Starmer what appears to be a fatal blow. And in Minneapolis, a combination of communists and NGO-paid rioters is trying to replay the George Floyd Summer of Love and is instead showing why ICE’s work is essential to good order. The media is trying to help the rioters by concocting a “bait boy” fable.

Davos

Niall Ferguson sums up: “The reality is that Trump won Davos, hands down. And not only did he win it; he owned it. I have never before seen a single individual so completely dominate this vast bazaar of the powerful, the wealthy, the famous, and the self-important.” Continue reading

Greenland Crisis: Macron’s Unprecedented Threat to US Moves

Macron Threatens US With “Unprecedented” Consequences If It Moves on Greenland

https://shiftfrequency.com/what-macrons-snap-election-means-for-french-politics/Robert Semonsen – France’s lame duck, globalist President Emmanuel Macron has issue a ‘sharp warning’ over Washington’s renewed push to bring Greenland under US control, claiming the idea a direct threat to European sovereignty.

Remarks from Macron, widely despised in France and hardly taken seriously abroad, reflect growing unease in Europe over how utterly dependent the continent has become on American military power—and how little leverage it has when Europe’s interests diverge from US interests. Continue reading

US Moves to ‘Acquire Greenland’: What It Means for You

White House Confirms It’s Working to ‘Acquire Greenland’

White House Confirms It’s Working to ‘Acquire Greenland’Madeleine Jackson – President Donald Trump’s White House has officially confirmed that the administration is actively exploring options to acquire Greenland, a strategic Arctic territory currently part of the Kingdom of Denmark.

In a statement to Reuters this week, the White House made clear that President Trump sees Greenland as essential to America’s defense posture:

“President Trump has made it well known that acquiring Greenland is a national security priority of the United States, and it’s vital to deter our adversaries in the Arctic region. The president and his team are discussing a range of options to pursue this important foreign policy goal, and of course, utilizing the U.S. military is always an option at the commander-in-chief’s disposal,” White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said. Continue reading

Why Greenland Should Break Free from Denmark Again

Denmark Surrendered Greenland Once; It Should Do It Again

Denmark Surrendered Greenland Once; It Should Do It Againamuse – Greenland did not drift into American stewardship by accident. It arrived there because Denmark dropped it. That fact is routinely obscured by euphemism and sentiment, but it is the hinge on which the entire moral and legal argument turns.

In April 1940, Denmark was occupied by Nazi Germany. Copenhagen fell in hours. Its government capitulated and chose accommodation over resistance.

Danish state institutions continued to function under German supervision, cooperating administratively and economically with the occupying power. Its armed forces stood down. And its far-flung colony in the Arctic was abruptly severed from the metropole. No money. No ships. No defense. No instructions. Denmark did not merely lose control of Greenland. It relinquished it, while collaborating under and alongside a hostile regime, in every way that matters. Continue reading