Equal Protection Demands Colorblind Remedies: A Legal Look

Reparations By Race Do Not Repair A Nation. They Divide One.

Alexander Muse – Begin with a simple picture, because the law in this case is finally as simple as the picture. Two families lived on the same Evanston street in 1955. They shared a fence, a school district, and very likely a set of grievances against the city that zoned and policed them.

Today the city of Evanston will write one of those families a check for $25,000 and turn the other away at the door. The families are identical in every particular the law has ever cared about, with one exception. One family is Black and the other is not. That single fact, and nothing else, decides who is paid and who is refused.

When a government sorts its citizens that way, it is doing the precise thing the 14th Amendment was ratified to forbid. This is the heart of the matter, and it is worth stating plainly before the lawyerly fog rolls in. The Equal Protection Clause protects persons, not races.

Continue reading

Rosa Parks: The First Lady Of The Civil Rights Movement [Video]

Unlike “Social Justice Warriors” Parks actually fought for something worthwhile.

Rosa ParksTimeline – In Montgomery, the first ten seats of every bus were reserved for white patrons, regardless of whether or not they were being used. It was common to see blacks standing over the empty seats. On December 1, 1955, Rosa Parks and three other black passengers were asked to move from their seats which were behind the white section in order to allow a white man to be seated.

The three others conceded after being threatened. However, Ms. Parks continued to refuse and was arrested, jailed, booked, fingerprinted and fined. Three friends of Rosa Parks arrived at jail to post her bond: a white liberal lawyer, Clifford Durr; his wife, a white civil rights activist who employed Rosa as a seamstress; and E.D. Nixon, the former Vice President of the NAACP’s state and local branches for whom Rosa worked as a secretary. Continue reading

Sartre ~ Hate Laws Intended To Silence Truth

BATR  May 5 2014

In a relativism culture of social permissiveness, the non-judgmental attitude, held out as the suitable standard for conduct, has become the politically correct behavior. One might think that anything goes under this mindset. However, the exact opposite practice and enforcement, under the most rigid conditions, is championed as necessary for enlightened and tolerant liberalists. The proliferation of demands that hate speech is the new capital crime, actually is counter iterative in building a civil society. This orthodoxy of the fanatical, proudly presents this illuminated and required deportment, as obligatory for all citizens.

So what exactly is hate for the neo-Jacobins? Obviously, whatever the “Society of the Friends of the LIVING Constitution” deems it to be, because under the color of law, the self-proclaimed pure of heart, are justified to off the heads of anyone who dares speak out in inappropriate terms. Remember “thinking progress” for the greater good, must be imposed on anyone who dare defies the wisdom of the gatekeepers for the collective.

Racism has to go, unless practiced by Negros against whites, or is the mere mention of such a term a slight to African-Americans? Once upon a time cries of anti-Semitism would be heard if Donald Sterling was made a pariah after the NAACP did an about face after awarding him for promoting civil rights. Not in today’s world, such a distasteful zealot no longer has the protection of his tribe from the scrutiny of the thought police. The almost total condemnation of his recently private remarks has the entire sports world clambering for his forced sale of the LA Clippers. Continue reading