Global warming, pollution, mountains of filth, and escalating health-care costs. Fossil fuels leave environmental, economic, and humanitarian wreckage behind.
We can’t say we weren’t warned. Scientists have been telling us since the 1960s, that burning fossil fuels have the potential to bring about catastrophic change.
This also poses danger to our own bodies. Despite these threats, we’ve continued to rely on coal, oil, and gas for most of our energy. Continue reading
Joe Martino – Amidst the climate alarmism that is sometimes misplaced, there are stories that paint a different picture.
Like the study published in the American Meteorological Society’s Journal of Climate showing that climate models exaggerate global warming from CO2 emissions by as much as 45%.
Or the study in the journal Nature Geoscience that found that climate models were faulty. As one of the authors put it, “We haven’t seen that rapid acceleration in warming after 2000 that we see in the models.”
How about the findings from the University of Alabama-Huntsville showing that the Earth’s atmosphere appears to be less sensitive to changing CO2 levels than previously assumed?
Or the fact that Polar Bear populations are increasing? Continue reading
Sean Adl-Tabatabai – A leading MIT scientist claims that global warming science is based on pure propaganda, and that the “97 percent consensus” statistic is false.
According to Dr. Richard Lindzen, most scientists do not agree that CO2 emissions are the cause for climate change.
Dailycaller.com reports: “It was the narrative from the beginning,” Lindzen, a climatologist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), told RealClear Radio Hour host Bill Frezza Friday. “In 1998, [NASA’s James] Hansen made some vague remarks. Newsweek ran a cover that says all scientists agree. Now they never really tell you what they agree on.”
“It is propaganda,” Lindzen said. “So all scientists agree it’s probably warmer now than it was at the end of the Little Ice Age. Almost all Scientists agree that if you add CO2, you will have some warming. Maybe very little warming.”
“But it is propaganda to translate that into it is dangerous and we must reduce CO2,” he added.
Lindzen if referring to the often cited statistic among environmentalists and liberal politicians that 97 percent of climate scientists agree human activities are causing the planet to warm. This sort of argument has been around for decades, but recent use of the statistic can be traced to a 2013 report by Australian researcher John Cook. Continue reading
Mike Adams – Instead of being attacked and criticized by the delusional, mindless Left that has abandoned all reason and logic, President Trump should be thanked for saving America from the horrendous Paris Climate Treaty fraud.
The entire narrative of global warming and “climate change” has been rooted in deliberate scientific fraud from the very start. Even the infamous “hockey stick” temperature graph was totally fabricated by hacking the climate software models to produce alarming hockey stick formations from any data set, including random “noise” data.
Climate change cultists have pushed their Big Government climate change agenda to enslave humanity while ignoring far more dangerous and real threats to our planetary ecosystems, demanding we all join their “collective psychosis” that has them trembling with fear and alarm over a totally non-existent problem. Carbon dioxide isn’t a “pollutant,” it’s the most important molecule for sustainable life on our planet! Continue reading
Makia Freeman – Pope Francis of the Catholic Church recently came out and released an Encyclical “Laudato Si” (although someone leaked it ahead of time and released it for him) focused on tackling the issues of poverty and environmental damage. As noble as this sounds, however, in doing so the Pope fell into the trap set up by the Club of Rome and other elite think tanks of blaming man for global warming. Rather than sticking to a more general message of caring for the Earth and treating the environment responsibly, the Pope’s message was decidedly political. By entering into politics with the Rockefeller-and-CFR-created United Nations at his back, one has to wonder if the Pope is positioning himself – or being positioned – to be the head of the planned One World Religion which has long been planned as an integral part of the structure of the New World Order (NWO).
The push to make the Pope the head of the UN One World Religion has been going on awhile. Last year, for instance, former Israeli President (and therefore by definition war criminal) Shimon Peres held public talks with the Pope and expressed his desire for Pope Francis to lead the world into a One World Religion. According to the Jerusalem Post, Peres’ idea is to create a UN-like organization called the “United Religions”. The website cfnews.org also states:
Peres “proposed the founding of a United Religions organization — modeled after the United Nations — to fight terrorism”. In an interview with the Catholic magazine Famiglia Cristiana, Peres said he wanted to establish an international body representing the world’s major religions, as “an unquestionable moral authority” able to intervene in conflicts, “a UN of religions”.
How interesting that the old abstract bogeyman “terrorism” is even being used to push for a One World Religion. The elite must love that one concept of terrorism given how much mileage they seem to extract from it.