Trump’s Classified Documents Case: A Legal Integrity Question

Trump's Classified Documents Case: A Legal Integrity QuestionKari Donovan – In a recent report by Julie Kelly, a concerning narrative continues to unfold this week surrounding a classified documents case involving President Donald Trump. The focus of the investigation centers on allegations of a criminal conspiracy involving one of President Biden’s top White House lawyers and an attorney from the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).

The accusation suggests a deliberate effort to bypass notification laws outlined in the Presidential Records Act, raising questions by Kelly and others about the integrity of the legal process. Continue reading

Trump’s Legal Journey Filled With Twists And Turns

Trump’s Legal Journey Filled With Twists And TurnsTed Noel, MD – Rather than walk through all the convoluted bits of Trump’s active Federal cases, it’s probably better if I simply hit the bullet points on the ones being heard right away. I’ll try to skip over lots of legalese on the way to giving you a clearer view of complicated processes. You can dig in farther to understand more details before the D.C. Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court rule on the cases in front of them. All the pleadings are on line. The shortest ones are about forty pages.

The first case to be heard is in the DCCA. SCOTUS held that the appeal by Donald Trump on presidential Immunity would be heard in “regular order” by the DCCA before SCOTUS would look at it. They did not rule on the merits. Continue reading

‘Big Difference’ Between Trump Docs Case, And Biden’s

'Big Difference' Between Trump Docs Case, And Biden'sNicole Wells – Former President Donald Trump took to Truth Social on Tuesday to rail against President Joe Biden’s removal of classified materials from Washington and the alleged difference in treatment the two men have received.

“I see that Crooked Joe Biden is working on his documents situation,” Trump wrote on the social media site. “He moved documents, many classified, all over the place, for years, including to CHINATOWN. He even took documents as a Senator, an absolute no, no! I come under the Presidential Records Act, he doesn’t — A big difference!!! I did nothing wrong, he did, and so did many others!” Continue reading

The Mathematics of Democrat ‘Justice’

The Mathematics of Democrat ‘Justice’George W. Shuster – Judge Tanya Chutkan of the D.C. Federal District Court has ruled that the trial there against Trump will begin March 4, 2024. Many have already commented on how badly that will impact candidate Trump subjectively, given the electoral calendar’s Super Tuesday primaries the next day. Attention should also be directed to how Democrat “justice” is being imposed on defendant Trump in objective terms.

Let’s review the math.

When March 4 rolls around, the prosecution will have had about 38 months to prepare its case since the events of January 6, 2021. The Trump defense team will have had a little over six months since indictment. That is a disparity of over six to one, advantage offense. Continue reading