Paul Dowling – Does a globalist Big Pharma have the power to bring about a zombie apocalypse? Sounds ludicrous on the face of it, like a big joke given voice by crackpot conspiracy theorists. In fact, the idea has been a running gag of sorts, in movies and assorted media, going back eight decades and more.
In the 1940 movie The Ghost Breakers, there is a humorous scene – featuring the talents of Paulette Goddard, Bob Hope, and Richard Carlson – where Carlson, a man with intimate knowledge of the undead, is being queried by Hope about zombies; Carlson responds by saying, “It’s worse than horrible, because a zombie has no will of his own. You see them sometimes, walking around blindly with dead eyes, following orders, not knowing what they do, not caring.”
Greg Hunter – Michigan State University Economics Professor Mark Skidmore is an expert in public finance and policy evaluation. About this time last year, Dr. Skidmore identified a public policy to withhold lifesaving CV19 drugs such as hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) that cost at least 100,000 needless deaths. Skidmore is out with a new report that says at least 1.4 million have been killed or seriously injured, so far, from the CV19 injections.
Dr. Skidmore contends the FDA and CDC are covering up serious danger and harm being done to people. Dr. Skidmore explains, “We need actual scientific studies, but we are not getting them. . . .
Team cures cancer with innovative treatment, child-patients stuck with staggering bills.
Image: US Marine Corps General Smedley Butler was a two-time Medal of Honor recipient, and anti-war. He wrote “War is a Racket.” Despite the torrent of pro-war propaganda we are bombarded with, and all the pretexts and excuses used to sell endless global conflict, it is indeed a racket perpetrated by big-business interests at the rest of humanity’s expense, and has been for a long time.
In “On the Cusp of Ending Big Pharma,” a coming revolution in biology and medicine made possible by a better understanding of genetics and gene therapy was described in detail. Almost as if to validate the premise of having the public begin getting directly involved in not only understanding genetics and gene therapy, but begin building the infrastructure at a local level to pursue research and development, as well as implement eventual techniques and treatments, Philly.com has just recently published a follow up to an incredible story.
Titled, “Girl’s gene-therapy estimate gives Children’s Hospital a shiner,” the article describes a clinical trial in which gene therapy was used to treat 10 adults and 2 children suffering from cancer, most of whom have had their cancer go into remission, and the staggering bills the treatment incurred. Charities and insurance assisted at least one patient, while another, a 5-year-old Croatian girl, was left with a $837,000 bill.
Medical care is expensive. It requires the absolute cutting edge in technology, skilled doctors and technicians to utilize it in the care of patients, all within an economic paradigm where demand vastly outnumbers supply. What could be done to reduce the disparity between supply and demand? And what can be done until then to ensure people get the absolute best treatment possible? Or should a 5 year old girl perish because she can’t afford experimental treatment when all other options were sure to fail?
Trillions for War…
Soldiers fighting the fruitless decade long wars in Iraq and Afghanistan didn’t need to buy their own weapons, procure their own transportation to the warzone, buy their own meals, and when they were injured, pay for their own medical treatment. Indeed, these fruitless wars built openly on categorically false premises, were subsidized by trillions of dollars from American tax payers despite the wars having no public support. Since these two fruitless wars sold upon a pack of lies, the United States has conducted combat operations in Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Uganda, inside Pakistan, Mali, and covertly in Iran. Again, subsidized by trillions of tax payer dollars.
