The Curious Case of Judge Boasberg: Justice or Partisan Play?

The Selective Outrage of Judge James Boasberg

The Selective Outrage of Judge James BoasbergJonathan Turley – For months, District Court Chief Judge James Boasberg has been very much in the news. This spring, he issued a 46-page decision finding that the Trump administration may be in contempt of court for violating his order to return flights of deportees being sent to El Salvador.

In that ruling, Boasberg insisted that it was essential for him to know the facts on whether “officials of a coordinate branch” had undermined judicial integrity. After all, nothing short of the separation of powers was at stake. This week, Boasberg announced that he was moving forward without further delay to ferret out who was responsible for the alleged violation. Continue reading

Formal Complaint Alleges Judicial Bias in Trump Cases

Bondi Files Formal Complaint Against Judge Boasberg For Shocking Public Comments Admitting Bias Against Trump Administration

Cristina Laila – US Attorney General Pam Bondi on Monday announced the Justice Department filed a misconduct complaint against Judge James Boasberg for making ‘improper public comments’ and admitting bias against the Trump Administration.

DOJ Chief of Staff Chad Mizelle said Judge Boasberg “violated the Canons of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, including the requirement that he “promote public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.”” Continue reading

Legal Hat Trick: Supreme Court Affirms Trump’s Authority

Trump’s Supreme Court wins push arrogant judges back in their lane

Legal Hat Trick: Supreme Court Affirms Trump’s AuthorityAndrew Cherkasky and Katie Cherkasky – In a stunning rebuke to activist judges, the Supreme Court and the 4th Circuit on Monday handed President Trump a legal hat trick, affirming his authority to protect America from foreign threats and thrusting the judiciary back into its constitutional lane.

These three rulings — concerning the Alien Enemies Act, an MS-13 deportation and government transparency — must serve as a powerful repudiation of the judicial overreach that has sought to obstruct Trump’s agenda.

First, the Supreme Court slammed the brakes on DC District Court Judge James Boasberg and greenlit Trump’s expeditious deportation of Tren de Aragua thugs and other alien enemies. Continue reading

Remove Judge Boasberg: A Swift Solution to Judicial Activism

‘Rogue’: Congressman pushes new way to yank anti-Trump Judge Boasberg from office

'Rogue': Congressman pushes new way to yank anti-Trump Judge Boasberg from officeBob Unruh – James Boasberg, the federal judge in Washington who repeatedly has disrupted President Donald Trump’s efforts to secure and protect America with his judicial activism, could face impeachment for his actions.

But that’s a long and cumbersome process.

So U.S. Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., has introduced a resolution simply to remove him office for refusing to abide by the Constitution’s requirement that judges can remain in office during their “good behavior.” Continue reading

Supreme Court Precedent Ignored by Judge in Injunction Against Deportations

‘So Troubling’: Gregg Jarrett Says District Judge Is ‘Defying The Supreme Court’ Over Trump Deporting Gangs

Supreme Court Precedent Ignored by Judge in Injunction Against DeportationsFox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett slammed a federal judge who tried to block the Trump administration from flying members of Tren de Aragua (TdA) to El Salvador Monday.

United States District Judge James Boasberg of the District of Columbia issued an injunction March 15 ordering President Donald Trump’s administration to turn two planes carrying members of the Venezuelan gang around. Jarrett noted that a Supreme Court decision during the presidency of Harry Truman applied to Trump’s order to deport the gang members. Continue reading