Sartre ~ Nelson Mandela The Myth And The Reality

BATR  December 9 2013

“The suggestion made by the State that the struggle in South Africa is under the influence of foreigners or communists is wholly incorrect. I have done whatever I did, both as an individual and as a leader of my people, because of my experience in South Africa and my own proudly felt African background, and not because of what any outsider might have said.” – Nelson Mandela

Nelson Mandela the Myth and the Reality

mandela_batr

Seldom does a cultural test so clearly delineate the rational from the imbeciles. The interminable eulogizing of Nelson Mandel is an unambiguous sign of the lack in historic perspective and understanding that passes for public consensus. The mass media would have you believe that Mandela is a hero, when the evidence and particulars tell a very different story. Let no fact get in the way of making a New World Order icon. Simply put, the elites created Communism as a step towards imposing a universal authoritarian dictatorship.

The Mandela presidency of South Africa, 1994–1999 set in motion the destruction of a country that long defied the forces of global interdependency. The enshrinement of a multicultural nirvana is a commissar tenant of the campaign against an independent Afrikaner society. How did it work out? The betrayal by F. W. De Klerk of not opposing Mandela was the death knell of a first world country.

[youtube=http://youtu.be/jeXW9Pes1mQ&w=500]

Do you have the courage to watch the video, Nelson Mandela The Terrorist is Dead or is such a inference an automatic rejection of your “inquiring mind”, because you subscribe to the Morgan Freeman school of idolization: “a saint to many, a hero to all who treasure liberty, freedom and the dignity of humankind.” Well, his idea of a “Freeman” probably missed the daily rushes of Mandela’s death skills, as he was reading from the Invictus script.

Continue reading

John Pilger ~ THE GLOBAL SPY APPARATUS: You Are All Suspects Now. What Are You Going To Do About It?

Global Research | April 26 2012

European Court of Human RightsYou are all potential terrorists. It matters not that you live in Britain, the United States, Australia or the Middle East. Citizenship is effectively abolished. Turn on your computer and the US Department of Homeland Security’s National Operations Center may monitor whether you are typing not merely “al-Qaeda”, but “exercise”, “drill”, “wave”, “initiative” and “organisation”: all proscribed words. The British government’s announcement that it intends to spy on every email and phone call is old hat. The satellite vacuum cleaner known as Echelon has been doing this for years. What has changed is that a state of permanent war has been launched by the United States and a police state is consuming western democracy.

What are you going to do about it?

In Britain, on instructions from the CIA, secret courts are to deal with “terror suspects”. Habeas Corpus is dying. The European Court of Human Rights has ruled that five men, including three British citizens, can be extradited to the US even though none except one has been charged with a crime. All have been imprisoned for years under the 2003 US/UK Extradition Treaty which was signed one month after the criminal invasion of Iraq. The European Court had condemned the treaty as likely to lead to “cruel and unusual punishment”. One of the men, Babar Ahmad, was awarded 63,000 pounds compensation for 73 recorded injuries he sustained in the custody of the Metropolitan Police. Sexual abuse, the signature of fascism, was high on the list. Another man is a schizophrenic who has suffered a complete mental collapse and is in Broadmoor secure hospital; another is a suicide risk. To the Land of the Free, they go — along with young Richard O’Dwyer, who faces 10 years in shackles and an orange jump suit because he allegedly infringed US copyright on the internet.

As the law is politicised and Americanised, these travesties are not untypical. In upholding the conviction of a London university student, Mohammed Gul, for disseminating “terrorism” on the internet, Appeal Court judges in London ruled that “acts… against the armed forces of a state anywhere in the world which sought to influence a government and were made for political purposes” were now crimes. Call to the dock Thomas Paine, Aung San Suu Kyi, Nelson Mandela.

What are you going to do about it?

Continue reading