Technocracy

Silicon Valley elites’ vision of the future

~ admin ~ Leave a comment

Gregory Ferenstein – In just ten years, Facebook built a global empire that surpassed General Electric in market value—and did it with just 4 percent of the Old Economy giant’s workforce: 12,000, compared with 300,000. Whatsapp, a recent Facebook acquisition, managed an even more impressive wealth-to-labor ratio, with a $19 billion value and just 55 employees. Combined, both companies reach roughly one-sixth of humanity. Facebook’s entertainment colleague just to the south, Netflix, crushed Blockbuster’s mammoth national network of 9,000 stores and 60,000 employees with its more nimble workforce of just 3,700 employees. It’s easy to see why: for just $10 a month, Netflix consumers could enjoy an unlimited video library larger than any of Blockbuster’s retail shops, without ever having to find their car keys. Blockbuster filed for bankruptcy protection in 2010.

Blockbuster’s fate has been duplicated many times. The Silicon Valley economy has caused massive disruption of traditional business and business models—in the process, making a relatively small cadre of brilliant engineers staggeringly wealthy. Until now, these dislocations, while profound, have been reasonably manageable. But in the years ahead, a vast new range of technological innovation—from self-driving cars to robots—may make the disruptions we have seen so far look tame. In this coming world, driven by innovation and powered by individual brilliance, what role will “normal” employees and small-business owners have? Continue reading →

A Deeper Understanding Of Technocracy

~ admin ~ Leave a comment

society

Jon Rappoport – Technocracy is the basic agenda and plan for ruling global society from above, so we need to understand it from several angles.

Consider a group of enthusiastic forward-looking engineers in the early 20th century. They work for a company that has a contract to manufacture a locomotive.

This is a highly complex piece of equipment.

On one level, workers are required to make the components to spec. Then they must put them all together. These tasks are formidable.

On another level, various departments of the company must coordinate their efforts. This is also viewed as a technological job. Organizing is considered a technology.

When the locomotive is finished and delivered, and when it runs on its tracks and pulls a train, a great and inspiring victory is won.

And then…the engineers begin to think about the implications. Suppose the locomotive was society itself? Suppose society was the finished product? Couldn’t society be put together in a coordinated fashion? And couldn’t the “technology of organizing things” be utilized for the job?

Why bother with endlessly arguing and lying politicians? Why should they be in charge? Isn’t that an obvious losing proposition? Of course it is.

But engineers could lay out and build a future society that would benefit all people. Hunger, disease, and poverty could be wiped out. Eliminating them would be part of the uncompromising blueprint.

Continue reading →

Technocracy: How Its False Assumptions and Pseudo-Science Could Affect You

~ admin ~ Leave a comment

Paul A. Philips – Darkly determined the world’s ruling elite and associates continue busying themselves with their goal of achieving total global domination through the technocracy agenda.

Globalism
Click pic for image credit

Essentially, the technocracy agenda incorporates technology into society with the intention of producing a new hybrid social structure. For this highly oppressive social engineering program to work, to exert complete control over we-the-people, it makes a number of false assumptions. These proven false assumptions based on pseudo-scientific principles with their applications clearly show that they conveniently serve the ruling elite’s goals to achieve the dictatorship.

Those serving the encroaching technocracy agenda, be them in the capacity of scientists, technicians, technologists, government officials, or academics etc., whatever their means to an end in support of the pseudo-science, at least some would have to see it as a belief system, blindly ignoring the contradictions or lack of scientific evidence in order to maintain their false beliefs…

Thus, the technocracy agenda is a form of scientism for unhealthy skeptics.

Here are some of those false assumptions based on pseudo-scientific principles and how it could affect you: How we-the-people are being socially engineered into surrendering our power to an oppressive technology-based control system for a dictatorship.

The global warming scam

If ever there’s an example of a mirage of science it’s in the technocracy agenda’s sales-pitch called carbon-based global warming. The ruling elite technocrats want you to believe this scam to justify a carbon tax currency, monitoring for energy consumption, setting strict limitations under the false pretext of saving the world while using unhealthy, surveillance-expanding ‘smart’ meters…

Continue reading →

The Matrix of technocracy: the roots of the conspiracy

~ admin ~ Leave a comment

“The cartels of the world become the cartels of the mind.”  – The Underground, Jon Rappoport

“If you are nothing more than a biological machine, then what you think doesn’t matter. There is no you. Confirming this, deciding this, is the technocrat’s wet dream.”  – The Magician Awakes, Jon Rappoport

science Jon Rappoport – Many independent researchers, writers, and broadcasters have exposed the operation called technocracy. I want to give particular thanks to Patrick Wood, whose investigations are essential. His most recent book is Technocracy Rising.

Consider the term “scientific humanism.” The Oxford Dictionary offers this definition: “A form of humanist theory and practice that is based on the principles and methods of science; specifically the doctrine that human beings should employ scientific methods in studying human life and behaviour, in order to direct the welfare and future of mankind in a rational and beneficial manner…Origin mid-19th century.”

Two items jump out from the page: “…in order to direct the welfare and future of mankind,” and “Origin mid-19th century.”

The first phrase obviously refers to a plan. And the plan emerges from being able to study, at a great height, populations and nations—in order to direct their behavior, in order to place them and move them on a chessboard. “Scientifically.”

Free will? Not important. Free exchange of goods and services? Not important. The unique vision and desire of the individual? Not important. Only science is important—whatever that means.

Science/rule by technology/technocracy becomes the justification for control.

For example: “We have studied the amount of energy that can be utilized by humans on planet Earth. Given the results, we will plan how to distribute it most humanely and rationally.”

Continue reading →

Henrik Palmgren Interviews Patrick Wood ~ Technocracy Rising [Audio]

~ admin ~ Leave a comment
technocracy
Henrik Palmgren

Patrick Wood is an author and lecturer who has studied elite globalization policies since the late 1970’s, when he partnered with the late Antony C. Sutton to coauthor Trilaterals Over Washington.

Patrick is with us to introduce his latest book, Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation. This follow-up to his works on the Trilateral Commission details how the organization quietly adopted a modified version of historic technocracy to craft a movement it called a “New International Economic Order.”

[youtube=https://youtu.be/_CwHlRR80AM]

Patrick outlines where the technocracy movement took root, and how this ideology ended up producing programs such as Sustainable Development, Agenda 21, Green Economy and Smart Growth.

He defines the technocratic economic system that was born during the 1930’s Great Depression, designed to replace capitalism’s price based system with an energy based system and currency. We discuss the philosophy at the heart of technocracy, envisaging how this “rule by experts” becomes problematic when a few select people take over a movement and manipulate it for their best interests. Continue reading →