Corey’s Digs – As with most agendas being perpetrated on human beings, those who manufactured the alleged “crisis” are those profiting from it, and some of these globalists are so slick, they can sell ice cubes to Eskimos. Parts 1-5 of this 9-part series revealed the Social Emotional Learning PreK-Adult obedience training being instilled through the education system and beyond, many who are involved, and just how far along this psychological agenda is.
Part 6 explains the human capital aspect, and shows the private sector funding that has been pumped into this agenda to train the obedient future workforce. This global agenda is already operating in 110 countries and billions are pouring into it.
Read:
Part 1: Introduction
Part 2: The Programming
Part 3: Spirituality in Education Programming
Part 4: WEF Vision for Global Education System
Part 5: U.S. Department of Education & Multiple Agencies Involved
Human Capital
“An emerging understanding of brain development has revealed a remarkable period of elasticity during adolescence — nearly a second infancy, and a second chance to capitalize on rapid change to build the habits of mind that support a thriving adulthood.” – call to action by Carnegie Corporation of New York
Everything the globalists pour money into is self-serving, despite their efforts to manipulate people into believing they do everything for the good of mankind. This particular agenda is no different. They are “investing” in “changing” the minds of children (and parents) to control all aspects of their characteristics and behavior, thinking, emotions, and beliefs so they can mold them to be their future workforce in a digital world where everyone’s moves, access, behavior, words, and spending is all tracked through blockchain and a social scoring system they’ve long been building.
According to researchers at Columbia University, in 2015 they determined that SEL programs have a strong return on investment (ROI) over long periods of time, stating that the programs generated an average return of $11 per $1 invested. Here is the full study which was funded by the NoVo Foundation, a foundation that is controlled by Peter Buffet with the initial donation from his father Warren of 350,000 shares (valued at $1 million) of Berkshire Hathaway.
Those involved in furthering this agenda, insist that “character” is what is most important when it comes to school, career, and life success, and under the guise of the need to change ones “character” they advocate for policy change to promote social and economic change. Whereas ones “character” certainly plays an important role in life, these folks want to bend it to their benefit.
According to Professor James J. Heckman, “Starting early gives a greater return. Investment in high-quality, early childhood development from birth – it makes dollars and sense.” Heckman has served as the Professor of Economics at the University of Chicago, where he directs the Economics Research Center and the Center for the Economics of Human Development, since 1973. It’s no coincidence that CASEL (co-founded by Eileen Rockefeller Growald) is based out of Chicago, or that the Rockefellers have deep ties in Chicago, including the fact that John D. Rockefeller was the founder of the University of Chicago.
Much of Heckman’s work focuses on “models of individuals,” “lifecycle skill formation,” and early childhood development, all of which has had quite an influence on policymakers. His “Heckman Equation” project was funded by the Pritzker Children’s Institute and the Buffet Early Childhood Fund. Neither is surprising, with both having ties to this overall agenda. As noted above, NoVo funded the ROI study on SEL programs, at the request of CASEL.
As documented in part 3 of this series, the Lisa and John Pritzker Family Fund donated $300,000 to the Center for Healthy Minds to advance its research on cultivating well-being and relieve suffering. They cultivate this “well-being” through smartphone apps that “train brains,” with projects funded by the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, NIH, NCCIH, and NIMH (who also funds CASEL).
In 2017, J.B. Pritzker and Heckman wrote an op-ed for The Hill, urging the new administration to subsidize early childhood education from birth to age three, and expand access to preschool starting at age four. They’ve spent decades trying to break apart the family unit, so they could use the “single mom” card for their agendas.
What is the Heckman Equation project? They sum it up as “invest, develop, sustain, and gain.” They want to invest in early human development of cognitive and social skills from birth to age five, sustain it through education all the way up through adulthood, and “gain a more capable, productive and valuable workforce that pays dividends to America for generations to come.”
They argue that they need to get them while they’re young because “skills developed through quality early childhood education last for a lifetime.” Though they want big investments toward preschool, they are eager to get their hands on them at birth, indicating that their research shows that birth-to-five high-quality education will provide a higher “rate of return” than preschool alone, with a 13% ROI. They claim that this return on investment will mean better life outcomes, better health, quality of life, less crime, higher IQ, better employment, and an “increase in mother’s labor income as a result of subsidized childcare.”
The 13% ROI is based on two preschool experiments (ABC/CARE) conducted in North Carolina in the 1970’s, which provided comprehensive developmental resources with access to nutrition, health care and early learning, to disadvantaged African-American children from birth to age five. This entailed creating a treatment group and control group in which some received the high quality treatment, while others utilized “low quality alternative childcare centers or in-home care.”
Their accumulated research involved data that was collected from birth until age 8, on cognitive and socio-emotional skills, home environments, family structure, and family economic characteristics. ABC/CARE provided childcare to the parents of the “treated” group for more than nine hours a day for five years. After age 8, they continued to collect data on cognitive and socio-emotional skills, education, and family economic characteristics at ages 12, 15, 21, and 30, with a full medical survey and detailed criminal activity at age 35.
Based on those studies, Heckman argues that it is a relevant study today, and that the negative effects of a disadvantaged early childhood are similar across races. The study states that treatment had significantly better life outcomes than those who stayed at home or who enrolled in low quality childcare centers. This study is all about separating the children from their mother at birth and getting them into programs that align with their overall agenda. Just imagine 9 hours of programming in children, every day for five long years.
While Heckman and this study may refer to it as “disadvantaged early childhood,” they want this system in place for ALL children, which is evident by the $400 billion free preschool for ALL, stuffed in the Build Back Better Bill they want passed. It’s no different than the claim of “poor people across the world don’t have a digital ID, therefore we ALL need digital IDs,” or “4.5% of the population identify as LGBTQ, therefore we all need to assign ourselves new pronouns,” or “some people don’t have access to internet in poor countries, therefore every child in the entire world needs to be plugged into the internet.” See their game?
They speak their intentions in plain language. Read it exactly as is stated, then consider who is funding it:
“ABC/CARE improved the economic prospects of treated children and their mothers, allowing the latter to enter the workforce and increase earnings while their children gained the foundational skills to make them more productive in the future workforce.”
Private Sector Funders
Below are some of the biggest private sector funders and supporters driving this agenda, who play an instrumental role in the promotion, research, policymaking, and profiting. This is by no means a complete list of those funding and supporting this obedience training and brainwashing agenda, but are coincidentally some of the same billionaire philanthropists profiting from the Covid agenda, vaccine industry, climate change, and other facets of the UN 2030 agenda they are all a part of.
Billions in state and federal grants are covered under the legislation section in part 7 of this report, which also directly links to the players in this chapter because of their influence over legislatures on policy making.
Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors
SF Source Corey’s Digs Feb 2022