Justice Scalia spent his last hours with members of this secretive society of elite hunters

Amy Brittain and Sari Horwitz – When Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia died 11 days ago at a West Texas ranch, he was among high-ranking members of an exclusive fraternity for hunters called the International Order of St. Hubertus, an Austrian society that dates back to the 1600s.

After Scalia’s death Feb. 13, the names of the 35 other guests at the remote resort, along with details about Scalia’s connection to the hunters, have remained largely unknown. A review of public records shows that some of the men who were with Scalia at the ranch are connected through the International Order of St. Hubertus, whose members gathered at least once before at the same ranch for a celebratory weekend.

ranch
Click to view pics on Washington Post

Members of the worldwide, male-only society wear dark-green robes emblazoned with a large cross and the motto “Deum Diligite Animalia Diligentes,” which means “Honoring God by honoring His creatures,” according to the group’s website. Some hold titles, such as Grand Master, Prior and Knight Grand Officer. The Order’s name is in honor of Hubert, the patron saint of hunters and fishermen.

Cibolo Creek Ranch owner John Poindexter and C. Allen Foster, a prominent Washington lawyer who traveled to the ranch with Scalia by private plane, hold leadership positions within the Order. It is unclear what, if any, official association Scalia had with the group.  Continue reading . . .

SF Source The Washington Post  Feb 2016

Hat tip, Consciously Connecting!

[widget id=”text-44″]

2 thoughts on “Justice Scalia spent his last hours with members of this secretive society of elite hunters

  1. This article, while pretending to hint at something sinister, is really a poorly executed diversionary tactic that fell on its sword. There were over 4,000 comments to it in the Washington Post. Of the many I read, no one is buying the cover up; undeniable evidence that mainstreamers are waking up.

    1. What I liked was the thoroughness with which the women documented who was there, what this “society” was all about – its roots in the 16th century, and, more importantly, its roots to the Vatican.

      All that said, I agree with you concerning the article’s lack of depth. They just can’t go the whole way. Too much (not directly related to Scalia) will tumble out. g

Please leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.