Reverse engineering Hillary’s crimes

foundationJon Rappoport – The Hillary email scandal and the Clinton Foundation scandal have been slithering, segment by segment, into public view.

And now we have “pay to play.”

The latest revelation, from the Associated Press:

“More than half the people outside the government who met with Hillary Clinton while she was secretary of state gave money — either personally or through companies or groups — to the Clinton Foundation. It’s an extraordinary proportion…Combined, the 85 donors contributed as much as $156 million [to the Foundation].”

The implication is clear. “You want a favor from the State Department? Pay the Clinton Foundation.”

The National Review gives us the tip of the iceberg:

“Crown Prince Salman of Bahrain wanted a sit-down with Secretary Clinton but was rebuffed; Clinton Foundation executive Douglas Band intervened through [Huma] Abedin to try to find a work-around for the crown prince, who gave donations to the Clinton Global Initiative totaling $32 million through 2010. Donations to the Clinton Foundation came in from the kingdom itself and from the state oil company. Band also intervened to secure a visa for a foreign athlete held up because of his criminal record, doing so at the behest of donor Casey Wasserman, a Hollywood sports-entertainment mogul, whose foundation has contributed between $5 million and $10 million to the Clinton Foundation…”

But let’s put all this in the right perspective. Let’s reverse engineer this. The media has it backwards.

Heading up the State Department didn’t incidentally afford Hillary the opportunity to funnel cash into the Clinton Foundation, in return for granting favors to donors. No.

Head of the State Department was her side job. She was really an officer of the Foundation. And as such, she picked out a plum position that would allow her to expand the Foundation’s coffers: she became Secretary of State.

It would be like the son of a mafia crime boss landing a slot as a judge, so he could rule in favor of his father’s mob associates in court. The judgeship was just an angle, a way of serving the family. The family comes first.

Yes, as Secretary of State Hillary could remain in the public eye—an essential factor for her later run for President. And she could also exercise her passion for making war and wreaking havoc: Libya is a prime illustration. But behind it all, she has been Hillary Clinton of the Clinton Foundation.

Right now, as the latest chapter in the Clinton Foundation scandal is exploding, Bill, her husband, is promising to tighten Foundation rules for accepting donations. He’s presenting a typical mafia ploy: “The Family is getting out of the rackets. We’re going completely legit.”

Sure they are. Bill and Hillary have an itch that can never be scratched. They have to run a racket. They have to pile up money through cons and schemes and payoffs. That will never change.

Hillary convincing Obama to give her the Secretary of State job was a champagne moment for the Clintons. The husband and wife team were in clover. The State Department would become their satellite office for the Foundation, and as such, it would go global and suck in gobs of cash from California to Saudi Arabia.

Annual huddle of the Foundation: “Well, folks, our marketing arm, also known as the State Department, has exceeded all expectations. Everything we’ve been working for, all these years, is coming to fruition. It’s called free money, and we’ve got it.”

What Hillary has done is typical for any clandestine agent: she went undercover; her cover story was, she was Secretary of State; in that role, she achieved hidden ulterior objectives.

Mission accomplished.

Except, as usual, she and her husband did sloppy work. They failed to conceal their operation properly. They wandered off the reservation.

What’s next? Well, how about the Clinton Global Initiative? What might be discovered during a deep probe of that charity? Now we’re talking about real money: over 2000 projects and 69 billion dollars raised (Reuters, 9/22/11). Who diverted and kept how much of that gargantuan sum? Who used money from that vault to extract favors?

Doug Band, the long-time Clinton associate who pulled off this fund-raising feat, was also, according to reports, the man who convinced Obama to give Hillary the job of Secretary of State. If true, one wonders if Band made the President an offer that was hard to refuse: a financial boon after the Oval Office faded in the rear-view mirror.

Every President needs a nest egg, something to fall back on after rendering public service to the nation.

Why shouldn’t the Clintons throw a few large bags of cash out of a plane winging over Hawaii, as the Chosen One and his family arrive to build their new home on a hill?

It’s only fair.

Jon Rappoport is the author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at NoMoreFakeNews.com or OutsideTheRealityMachine.

SF Source Jon Rappoport August 2016

[widget id=”text 44″]

5 thoughts on “Reverse engineering Hillary’s crimes

  1. You’re right about the polls. Also the lamestream media are tightening up the race on purpose because they’re concerned that if Dems think Hillary’s got it in the bag they won’t turn out for her. So yes, these are still manipulated numbers but less manipulated than those showing her with 7 point leads. The internal polls show Trump gaining strength in black and Hispanic communities.

  2. I told a friend of mine that the sleepers will be forced awake if and when Hills has to drop out of race due to health issues or arrest for crimes. I don’t see her making it to November but never underestimate the dirty tricks and crooks still in play.

  3. The corruption should be obvious to most reasonably intelligent people but there are still those who think Hills did nothing wrong and all the controversy is just a vast alt-right wing conspiracy because she is a woman. Unfortunately it’s this way in my own household to where my spouse and I can’t find much to discuss because we are now disagreeing with each other too often.

    I anticipate an increase in divorces after this election simply because the gap between awake and sleeping is becoming too irreconcilable. It’s not just about the usual Dem vs Repub, conservative vs liberal, false dichotomy. It truly is awake vs sleeping. At this point in the game the future of humanity depends on more people being awake. Sleeping is no longer an option.

    1. “At this point in the game the future of humanity depends on more people being awake. Sleeping is no longer an option.”

      Yes. You are absolutely correct. It is harder now than ever before because what appears to be so very OBVIOUS to the sentient and awake continues to be UNRECOGNIZED by the many with deeply entrenched belief systems that have as much connection to reality as the Stock Market to real-time brick and mortar realities. Those not yet awake are aided in their comatose states by mainstream presstitutes who tell straight-faced lies.

      But not all are that asleep. Check out these numbers in the latest political polls:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2l_n8yTnS4

      1. Thanks Gillian
        That poll of was by MSM source UPI so I suspect Trump’s lead is actually higher and not the razor edge margin.

Please leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.