Time And Timelines (The Nature Of Time)

AK Note ~ Two terms appear in this document that will be unfamiliar to most who visit this blog. These terms are LM and SM. The footnotes explain briefly who they are, but for simplicity you can think of LM = Service to Other beings, SM = Service to Self Beings. Daniel will be providing an follow-up paper on ETs/EDs.

I asked GW Hardin to examine the science in this article and he thinks its sound, he was astounded by what was revealed about time space and the reciprocal system. There are also many details missing from the Al Bielek account. One minor difference with the Al Bielek account is Daniel mentioned that they used an IBM mainframe to simulate the starship drive inputs to the device.

Al Bielek said it was a Cray Computer. Through my contact I asked about the computer and Daniel said the IBM mainframe was used because its ability to handle interrupts, where a Cray is primarily designed to crunch numbers. The simulated navigation inputs were not number intensive but they were interrupt intensive, something that I know personally IBM mainframes are good at doing. I do not know why Al Bielek said it was a Cray, his reference could be from a different time period.

GW Hardin will also be writing a follow up paper on some of the physics Daniel is not aware of in this technology. -AK

Coordinate timeOne of the least understood concepts known to man is that of time. A great deal of headway regarding the nature of time was made by engineer Dewey B. Larson, published in his 1959 book, The Structure of the Physical Universe.

Larson asserts that both space and time are simply the aspects of a reciprocal ratio that he refers to as motion, 2 ~ have no other meaning, and cannot exist independently outside of this relation. He often drew an analogy to a box, with the outside being space, the inside being time, and the box being motion. If you have an inside and outside, then you have a box. If you have a box, then you have an inside and an outside. If you have an outside then you have an inside; an inside then an outside. So it is with space (outside), time (inside) and motion (box). The three concepts are always connected and cannot operate independently. Larson’s theory eventually became known as the Reciprocal System of physical theory.

In the reevaluation of the Reciprocal System, RS 2,3 it is pointed out that the concept of space-time is analogous to the Eastern concepts of yin-yang, where space is the yang aspect, and time the yin. As discussed in taijitu symbolism, yin-yang cannot be separated, just as Larson’s ratio of space to time cannot be separated.

Larson then took it one step further, observing that all the characteristics of space must also have a similar character in time. In space, we see a 3-dimensional, coordinate spatial grid with clock time. There, from the reciprocal perspective, there must also exist a realm that contains 3-dimensional, coordinate time with clock space. He refers to the former as the “material sector” and the latter as the “cosmic sector,” identified in conventional physics as the universe of antimatter.4

The material sector is our common reference frame, that contains the observable and measurable structures of the universe. The cosmic sector, however, remains unobservable and unmeasurable to our physical senses, though we can see its effects on how time changes space, those effects being called force fields (electric and magnetic fields). We cannot see a magnetic line of force until it interacts with a material object such as iron filings, and alters their behavior in space.

So what we have in the Reciprocal System model of the universe is two different sectors of existence, the 3D spatial, material sector of our common experience, and a 3D temporal, cosmic sector that we cannot directly perceive, but is still there, influencing space.

With a proper understanding of time, the concept of timelines can be understood as a path through a 3-dimensional, temporal landscape, where the ideas of past, present and future are just abstractions of that path in a temporal landscape. What is behind you is the past, where you are standing is the present, and what is in front of you is the future.

1 The Structure of the Physical Universe is an incomplete work that is currently out of print, superseded by the 3-volume set, Nothing But Motion, Basic Properties of Matter and Universe of Motion.

2 Larson originally used “space-time,” and later changed the label to “motion” as not to be confused with the common, coordinate representation of space-time used by conventional physics.

3 The Reevaluation of Dewey B. Larson’s Reciprocal System of physical theory. Website

4 In the Reciprocal System, it is technically “inverse matter”, not antimatter, since the relation is the multiplicative inverse, not the additive inverse inferred by the prefix, “anti-”.

SF Source American Kabuki | November 6 2012

One thought on “Time And Timelines (The Nature Of Time)

  1. Although I do not understand much of the science involved in this essay, some years ago while doodling and thinking about time, I drew a spiral and along it I placed small boxes which to me indicated time confined in space. Pointing to one box on the spiral, I drew an arrow with the note, “You are here.” considering it to be the timebox in which I presently find myself – 3D clock time of past, present, future. Further up the spiral, passing a few “boxes” on the way up, I drew another arrow pointing to another box with the note, “Where you want to be.” I considered that box to be 5D, where past, present, future are simultaneous. Though I’m still not sure as to the method to be employed to find myself in that 5D box, I’m determined to get there. Based on a loving intention for myself and for the good of All That Is, that, to me, is ascension. Hope that made sense. Love, B.

Please leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.