Will Precious Metals Purchasers Become Terrorists?

Michael Noonan – More people are becoming aware that not all is as it seems with the federal government, but there is still a reluctance, even a refusal, to attribute many of today’s existing problems as a root cause by the federal government, which is not a government of, by, or for the people.  Today’s de facto federal government has been a product of the globalists for over a century, starting in more earnest when the Rothschild’s financed both sides in the Civil War, and when Lincoln introduced the Executive Order, now routinely used by presidents to by-pass Congress in the Bread and Circus facade known as the federal government where the globalists are in  charge behind the “curtain.”

We are on record for consistently advocating the purchase of gold and silver for the past three years, regardless of price.  Some may fault us for exhorting purchases at much higher prices than are current.  The recommendations were for wealth preservation and not for speculation or profit, even though we can be criticized for the [temporary] erosion of supposed wealth preservation, and in some cases, the erosion is substantial.  The timing has been off, yet the reasoning, or purpose for buying and holding remains the same today, and even more pressing.

Reuters printed an interesting article, a few weeks ago, from which we will provide excerpts.  The full article is here.

U.S. eyes ways to toughen fight against domestic extremists

Here is the opening paragraph:

The U.S. Justice Department is considering legal changes to combat what it sees as a rising threat from domestic anti-government extremists, senior officials told Reuters, even as it steps up efforts to stop Islamic State-inspired attacks at home.

Not to be missed is the lumping of domestic Americans in the same sentence as ISIS.
Now, anyone who expresses discontent with the federal government is called an anti-government extremist, and they are labeled as a threat.  No regard is given to the validity of their cause or reason for dissent.  Actually, these individuals and/or groups are viewed as more than a threat:

Extremist groups motivated by a range of U.S.-born philosophies present a “clear and present danger,” John Carlin, the Justice Department’s chief of national security, told Reuters in an interview.

They are a clear and present danger, says the chief of national security.  The motivation is laughably described as a range of U.S.-born philosophies. The deeper one gets into the article, the less disguised is the association between those expressing a legitimate degree of  dissatisfaction with the federal government.  They are simply called domestic terrorists:

Carlin said his counter-terrorism team, including a recently hired counsel, is taking a “thoughtful look at the nature and scope of the domestic terrorism threat” and helping to analyze “potential legal improvements and enhancements to better combat those threats.”

No mention is ever made that ISIS was created, trained, armed, and still supported by the CIA/federal government.  Such pertinent details are not for public consumption.  Nor is any mention made that the US is considered the greatest threat to world peace, bringing nothing but destruction to many countries, especially in the Middle East, and/or economic warfare to those countries opposed to US greed and interests, including Europe.

Continue reading . . .

Michael Noonan is a Contributing Writer for Shift Frequency

SF Source Edge Trader Plus  Feb 2016

[widget id=”text-44″]