Simple Math Is Too Tough For Flat-Brainers

Johan Oldenkamp The most silly alternative theory that I have encountered so far is the so-called Flat Earth Theory of Eric Dubay. His website is Atlantean Conspiracy.com (link). Is this guy really that stupid? His main “evidence” for his ridiculous claim is that over a distance of 60 miles or 100 kilometers no curvature of the earth’s surface is visible. Apparently, simple math is too tough for him and his brain-dead followers.

flat earthThe radius of our home planet is about 3963 miles or 6378 kilometers, and her circumference is more or less about 25,000 miles or 40,000 kilometers. This simply means that you need to see farther than more or less 70 miles or 110 kilometers in order to detect a decrease of one degree of arc, if at all possible. Furthermore, all his other “evidence” can be refuted equally simply.

This flat earth silliness is most likely a CIA social media experiment in order to determine the percentage of flat-brainers in the alternative media community, as these naïve believers can next be used for other, more important mind-control programs. The whole idea behind this Flat Earth Theory is therefore data mining, and the same is true for other ridiculous theories as the Hollow Earth Theory and almost all extra-terrestrial stories. – Pateo Wholly Science

flat earthJohan H. Oldenkamp PhD is probably the most all-round scientist of this age. He has successfully reunified all pure sciences, all correct philosophies and all true spiritual teachings (including the true parts of each religion) into a logical whole that he named Wholly Science. Wholly Science integrates all knowledge concealed in ancient scriptures with all modern-day findings. Johan is the author of in total thirty-one books, of which six are in English (link).


The Flat Earth model is an archaic belief that the Earth‘s shape is a plane or disk. Many ancient cultures have had conceptions of a flat Earth, including Greece until the classical period, the Bronze Age and Iron Age civilizations of the Near East until the Hellenistic period, India until the Gupta period (early centuries AD) and China until the 17th century. It was also typically held in the aboriginal cultures of the Americas, and a flat Earth domed by the firmament in the shape of an inverted bowl is common in pre-scientific societies.[1]

The paradigm of a spherical Earth appeared in Greek philosophy with Pythagoras (6th century BC), although most Pre-Socratics retained the flat Earth model. Aristotle accepted the spherical shape of the Earth on empirical grounds around 330 BC, and knowledge of the spherical Earth gradually began to spread beyond the Hellenistic world from then on.[2][3][4][5]

The mistaken notion that people, including educated people, used to believe that the earth was flat, especially medieval Christians, has been referred to as the myth of the flat Earth. [6] Since the 20th century the consensus among historians of science has been that belief in a flat earth in the medieval and pre-modern periods were either nonexistent or very rare.[6]  Continue reading . . .

SF Source Pateo Wholly Science and Wiki  April 2015

3 thoughts on “Simple Math Is Too Tough For Flat-Brainers

  1. Kick Eric Dubay aside for a bit and do some other digging around and some interesting things show up. It could be mind control too. It’s at least interesting and causes one to entertain the notion of how they arrive at truth and who to believe….and why.

    Here’s an article on notable heliocentrist arguments that …… failed….
    http://www.biblicalscholarship.net/failed.htm

    And other notes worth reviewing for added perspective…
    http://www.wildheretic.com/heliocentric-theory-is-wrong-pt2/

    This quote from George Ellis in Scientifc American is also quite interesting:

    “‘People need to be aware that there is a range of models that could explain the observations,’ Ellis argues. ‘For instance, I can construct you a spherically symmetrical universe with Earth at its center, and you cannot disprove it based on observations.’ Ellis has published a paper on this. ‘You can only exclude it on philosophical grounds. In my view there is absolutely nothing wrong in that. What I want to bring into the open is the fact that we are using philosophical criteria in choosing our models. A lot of cosmology tries to hide that.’” (Thinking Globally Acting Universally, Oct. 1995 Scientific American Magazine)

    Edwin Hubble was apparently confronted with a crisis of evidence vs. cosmology and opted to be popular.

    “Such a condition [ie: geocentrism] would imply that we occupy a unique position in the universe, analogous, in a sense, to the ancient conception of a central Earth…This hypothesis cannot be disproved, but it is unwelcome and would only be accepted as a last resort in order to save the phenomena. Therefore we disregard this possibility…. the unwelcome position of a favored location must be avoided at all costs…. such a favored position is intolerable…Therefore, in order to restore homogeneity, and to escape the horror of a unique position…must be compensated by spatial curvature. There seems to be no other escape.”
    Edwin Hubble

    these ideas are even gaining more press now…..Maybe it’s more mind control??
    http://www.theprinciplemovie.com/wgn-tv-chicago-ran-piece-principle-said/

    ————————————————————
    Mind Control & Mass Deception runs rampant and some have a vested interested in presenting a false reality…The questions are: who’s doing it & for what ends?

    Seems that Evolution & Heliocentricity are absolute bedfellows….with both relying on faith, dogma and unproven assumptions.

    Question EVERYTHING….including Flat Earth….AND Johan….

Please leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.