Michael Sussmann found not guilty of lying to the FBI – Anyone surprised?

Ex-Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer Sussmann found not guilty of lying to FBINatalia Mittelstadt – The jury in the trial of 2016 Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann on Tuesday found the defendant not guilty on a charge of providing a false statement to the FBI, after deliberating in the morning and on Friday.

Special Counsel John Durham last year charged Sussmann with lying to the FBI, while working as a private attorney, for allegedly telling then-bureau general counsel James Baker that he was not working on behalf of any client while providing him with data he said supported an alleged secret communications channel between the Russian Alfa Bank and the Trump Organization.

Durham argued Sussmann was working on behalf of two clients, the Clinton campaign and former tech firm executive Rodney Joffe, when he presented Baker with two computer thumb drives of data and whites papers that Sussmann said supported an alleged connection between the organization and the bank.

The connection was allegedly a backchannel to the Kremlin.

The Sussmann-Baker meeting took place Sept. 19, 2016, just weeks before Trump-Clinton Election Day.

The trial is the first in Durham’s probe, created to look into the origins of the non-debunked Russia collusion plot.

“While we are disappointed in the outcome, we respect the jury’s decision and thank them for their service,” Durham said after the verdict. “I also want to recognize and thank the investigators and the prosecution team for their dedicated efforts in seeking truth and justice in this case.”

The next trial will be in October in Virginia for Igor Danchenko, a Russian analyst accused of lying to the FBI in connection with the collusion plot.

The jury resumed deliberations Tuesday by asking to see a couple of government exhibits. Closing arguments in the trial  closed Friday. which were followed by the jury deliberated for several hours before being dismissed for the long holiday weekend.

The trial lasted 11 days, including jury selection and deliberations.

Prosecution attorneys said during the trial the material “pure opposition research” and that Sussmann wanted an “October Surprise” in the 2016 presidential race.

Sussmann pleaded not guilty to the charge and faced up to five years in prison.

The trial was held in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia before Judge Christopher Cooper.

SF Source Just The News May 2022

Please leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.