NASA ~ Not A Smart Agency

A-Ok | The Intel Hub
December 19, 2011

C/2007 E2 (Lovejoy)I’m not sure how many of you ever visit the mouth piece of NASA , but I’d recommend it just so you can familiarize yourself with disinformation.

I make it a practice of visiting that site once a day just to see what garbage they are trying to sell for NASA. I probably shouldn’t be too surprised about a lot of the useless information that’s out there I mean after all anyone can put anything on the internet and someone is bound to think its truth.

The internet should be renamed the disinformation highway. Why should these government funded websites be any different, if not more so?

Before I go into why I modified the acronym “NASA” to what’s in the title of this article I want to spend a little time relaying a theory to you I discovered from a man named James McCanney. I’ve read his works and his personal history and of his journey getting to where he is now.

If you are unfamiliar with him look him up, and as he says go directly to his website because he gets a lot of bad press from those wonderful disinformation sites out there.

Here’s a brief history of Mr. McCanney to help you understand why he’s being mentioned in this article. James McCanney started off like many of us in terms of his path in life. He went to school, he tried to figure out where you fit in terms of his interests and then he decided on what he’d try to do in terms of a college education or advanced education for his ultimate career.

Mr. McCanney ended up studying physics and solar dynamics and learned what many of us thought and probably still think is true, what NASA told us is true. He actually studied abroad and from what I can recall he actually visited a lot of the ancient sites as they were being discovered and new archeological digs sprung up.

He wrote several papers and theorized that comets weren’t snowballs flying through space, but rather electrically charged bodies in space. I’m not a physicist, nor am I qualified to give you all the details on how all of this works, but I have a rough idea from what I’ve read and I can tell you without a doubt if you trust NASA or anything you read on SpaceWeather, you might want to recheck the facts.

From the comet model proposed by James McCanney comets interact with celestial bodies electrically. Similarly to static electricity, or those of you familiar with the works of Nikola Tesla, plasma discharge. I hope that if I’m getting any of this wrong James McCanney will post a reply to this article correcting me.

I want to make sure that you get the most information regarding these things so you can be more prepared and aware of the disinformation you’re being fed. Not just with SpaceWeather or NASA, but the hundreds and thousands of other websites out there that are designed to completely throw you off the track of truth by feeding you half truths and believable lies.

Now, I’ll get back to those comets. Since you’ve probably seen those cool tesla towers or experienced static electricity you know that you don’t need wires to transmit electrical current. This can all be done wirelessly as Nikola Tesla theorized and proved.

Additionally, according to what I’ve personally witnessed this past year with comets that have plunged into the sun and from what McCanney theorizes this happens with comets very much the same way.

As planets align and these comets also align with the sun and other planets, like Jupiter for instance, they get these tails and in some cases, a tail to the front of the comet.

The tail to the front of the comet is in my limited brain your “static” or wireless electrical current interacting with the sun. I’m not taking any credit for any of this, because this isn’t my discovery, I just believe it to be 100% true.

The cover of James McCanney’s book, “Planet X, Comets and Earth Changes” shows an ancient pictorial depiction of two comets, both with these tails in the front of the comets. He explains in his book why he chose to use that for his cover and also explains what the ancient peoples knew about comets.

Without giving away everything in the book I’d suggest picking up a copy of it, or at the very least just read about comets on Mr. McCanney’s site. It’s very informative. Not a flashy site by any means, but I don’t go to his site for the latest gossip of the Hollywood stars. I go there for information about the weather, his research and of course the real stars.

Now that I’ve mildly covered what I understand about comets I’ll get into the purpose of this article, disinformation. As I mentioned already this isn’t just singling out spaceweather and NASA, there are tons of other sites out there and you’re not going to know if what you’re reading is truth or what’s disinformation unless you do your own research.

Comet Lovejoy

On SpaceWeather they’ve been covering Comet “Lovejoy” and originally they stated that they expected this “dirty ball of ice” to vaporize as it passed close to or plunged into the sun. Yeah I’d assume that too considering if you threw an ice cube into a furnace it would melt really fast, so the sun being immensely hotter it should vaporize. Ok, so what happened with the comet? Did it vaporize? Read on.

We’ve seen recently several comets that plunged into the sun and the last one that I can remember that took that suicidal path ended up hitting “roughly” the same time as a pretty major solar flare or coronal mass ejection (CME). Now according to SpaceWeather and NASA this was a “weird coincidence” because comets don’t cause electrical issues with the sun, nor could they cause a solar flare.

This is exactly why I check out SpaceWeather every single day, because I get a good laugh at the attempts of those “experts” to fool me. The sun is like a giant battery and is super magnetized.

Anyone that understands electricity understands what a capacitor is and what it does. It stores electricity until it is discharged. A comet coming into our solar system can discharge the sun, which as I understand it is simply what you witness when there’s a solar flare.

The “plunging” comets and mainly the one that caused that huge solar flare earlier this year can cause major electrical disturbances with regard to our sun and also our planets. Now if we turn our attention back to Comet Lovejoy, SpaceWeather reports that there is apparently a “mystery” about this comet.

The first question is why didn’t Lovejoy burn up or disintegrate like they theorized? Secondly, the comet tail wiggled, now why in the name of all that is holy would the comet tail wiggle? Personally, I think a lot of those “experts” at NASA and at SpaceWeather can’t help it because they buy into the lies, so they’re probably all understandably perplexed.

Meanwhile the ones that put out the lies to these “experts” are laughing at not just the “experts” but at anyone that will believe this baloney.

I’d like to see what James McCanney says about this “wiggle”, and I am eager to read what he posts up about this “mystery”, but while I wait for his response to this latest bit of disinformation I’ll post up what I think happened.

As I mentioned above comets interact with our sun and discharge our “solar capacitor” (that’s a James McCanney trademark and I take no credit for the awesome term that belongs to him, not me) so then if that’s true one can easily make the connection that as the comet passed the surface of the sun it caused through intense magnetism and electrical current the tail to go into a wave. Look at an electrical current to understand this a little better.

On SpaceWeather  they do make a vague connection to the potential magnetism and electrical factor here, but only in the sense that they believe the tail was attaching itself magnetically to the “coronal loops.” That sounds intelligent, so it must be right. Partial truth, cause in point.

I’ll be waiting to see what James McCanney has to say about this. I use spaceweather.com for the humor factor, plus they sometimes post up neat pictures of our solar system or the northern lights. You can also gleam some truth out of the site, but you really have to be looking for it and not just taking their word for it.

As I mentioned I’m not an expert in anything I discussed in this article other than being an expert skeptic. If you want the real information I’ve given you the place to discover it. It’s up to you to go there and read it for yourself. I’m just trying to get people to see what’s out there and not just take the word of an “expert”. I’m an expert too, please see above.

When visiting websites use some common sense and I personally use a process of elimination approach. Compare sites that are similar to it. Do research, read books – old books, take your time and don’t get in a rush because information is valuable and you want the most accurate information.

I don’t always believe everything I read on James McCanney’s or any other site, until I research it myself because by nature I’m skeptical. Being informed is really up to you. Choose to accept what is easily given to you by the NWO or you can choose to actually work for the information and determine for yourself what is actually true and what’s false. Good luck!

Please leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.