Occult Man

manJon Rappoport – The word “occult” is frequently associated with a secret society, and it is given a negative twist by pitting it against organized “clean” religion or “totally rational” science.

But the Latin root of the word comes from the verb, “to hide.” That’s all.

Occult Man means man who is hiding something. And it really means man who is hiding something from himself. What would that be?

Occult man is hiding his true nature from himself.

In order to discover what that true nature is, he would already need to be free from the belief that he owes his time, energy, and life to another person or an idea. He would need to be free from the self-debasing concept of spiritual debt—regardless of how fashionable it might be to incur (or pretend to incur) such a negative balance sheet.

Legion are those who invent these “debt scenarios” for themselves, and they rarely give them up, regardless of the consequences. They prefer to imagine they “win by losing.”

When Occult Man embarks on the journey to find his true nature, he enters a labyrinth. Sooner or later, he needs to realize the maze is composed of all possible answers to his self-inquiry. How to choose one answer above all others? How to discern?

Nevertheless, despite the difficulties, he will choose. He will clutch an answer, he will adopt it, and he will begin to live on that basis. He will say, “This is my true nature,” he will climb into that conveyance and drive it down the road.

After a certain period, he will see its limitations, he will experience first-hand the pressure of those restrictions, and he will look for a more inclusive answer to his inquiry.

As this process of accepting, testing, and rejecting answers continues, he will become aware that each solution to what-is-my-true-nature gives birth to a space that is defined—and his primary role is to fit himself into that space.

In the majority of cases, Occult Man eventually talks himself into accepting a space and learning how to adapt to his position in it. It is as if, all along, he has been asking himself, “What is my place?”

Relatively few people are prepared to admit this is a loaded question. They would rather adhere to one of thousands of “philosophies” which are determined to tell Occult Man what his place is.

According to this sort of guidance, Occult Man is supposed to take pride in finding that place.

For those who can avoid this end, there remains a less-defined path. “Where do I go? What do I do? What am I looking for?”

What about looking within? As interesting as this option may seem, and as rooted in tradition, what results does it confer?

Either Occult Man looks within and sees, disappointingly, spaces populated by random objects and ideas, or he presupposes what he is going to discover, and then discovers it. Needless to say, such sleight of hand isn’t the means for finding his true nature.

What now?

Now we come to the threshold of a shift into another dimension of experience. Regardless of how long the journey has taken so far, now Occult Man begins to examine his very role as the searcher. The seeker. The discoverer.

Is the whole paradigm of question-inquirer-answer able to yield up the effect of finding his true nature?

And in parallel, can he harken back to some past tradition and say, “Well, my conundrum triggers answers put forth by this body of wisdom or that body of wisdom or this enlightened master…” Do these references give him what he wants?

At every turn, it seems as if he’s been looking for some sort of content or material or information that will unlock the door. Or perhaps he needs an experience that will shock his system into a new realm of perception.

All along, he has been searching for some kind of reality that is already there. A deeper reality, a more elevated reality. Concealed, out of view. Hidden.

Which is why he is Occult Man. Because of the way he has been proceeding.

But suppose…there is no such hidden reality which is his true nature. Suppose that is the cosmic joke.

And suppose, instead, he is the maker of realities.

Suppose that is his true nature.

Suppose every system and traditional belief avoids putting the finger on his true nature.

Suppose he has no pre-defined place.

Suppose the shape and character of societies and civilizations on Earth flow from the inability of individuals to see their true nature?

There is much more to say about this subject, but I’ll leave it here for now—except to mention that everything I’ve authored in my collection, Exit From The Matrix, is designed to increase an individual’s power to make realities of his own choosing.

Jon Rappoport is the author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

SF Source Jon Rappoport  Nov 2015

[widget id=”text-44″]

6 thoughts on “Occult Man

  1. interesting,especially when one looks at the Advaita or non-duality perspective eg Robert Adams, Sri Ramana Maharshi or Nisargadatta Maharaj,who once told a follower” you don’t exist….you were never born and you will never die”

  2. And suppose that one person is awake to the nature of his/her true reality, and suppose that one person understands the hologram of One, then doesn’t it follow that everyone is awake?

    1. Yes and no – from my perspective.

      As each slice of consciousness (you/me) is a discrete part of the whole, when one (single) discrete element “gets it” this does trigger advancement within the whole. However, the whole “Isness” is vast awareness – that is Itself continually evolving. It contains within its creational worlds infinite micro selves – some call them Souls.

      So, it seems to me, when one soul “is awake to the nature of his/her true reality, and . . . understands the hologram of One, doesn’t it follow that everyone is awake?” Yes – within that One fused CONSCIOUSLY with Creator Self, everyone is aware. No, not all within the expanding, evolving macrocosm of “Isness” are equally “there.”

      Deep stuff. Thanks for sharing . g

      1. Thanks, Gillian, for your response. A very long time ago I read in Joseph Benner’s Book, “The Impersonal Life” words to the effect that I wouldn’t notice in another what I dislike if it were not for the fact that that ‘what’ was in me. That one statement has had me attempting to clear the ‘logs’ from my eyes ever since. Macro/micro pictures for sure and sometimes I wonder if I’m not supposed to ‘get it’ as otherwise how would I expand my micro into the macro? The quest continues.

    2. In respond-se to Barbara,

      Yes, IMO, all of creation in all of the universe is awake……to being a part inseparable from the whole, unless the consciousness of being “self” chooses to experience separation from that awareness, of being included in the All that is. Therein lies the creation of the individual’s “path home”, usually laced with much personal pain and suffering resulting,eventually, in a “real-I-zation” of the bliss that comes when you/we let go of rowing upstream….going against the grain etc. etc. etc. … and lose our fear that giving up the ill-usion that separation is superior to BEing that part of the whole, that we allways have been and allways will be and allways will have our sense of individuality. So is that wonderfull part of creation…..Free Will…..allowing us to experience whatever we choose to experience without exclusion from the whole, and I believe, without judgement from the Whole of our choices. Judgement would only come from the separated self as part of the “suffering” thereof. And in closing, perhaps the most important part…..we are responsible personally for the choices we make.

      1. Agreed, William, trusting in the path of least resistance, but IMO first each must learn what it is they resist and why…. leading to response-ability. Thanks for the discussion and thanks to Jon for starting it off. Have to admit hide and seek was one of my favourite games when I was a kid, especially when I was “It”!

Please leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.