Sean Adl-Tabatabai – Sweden has announced that it is scrapping the WEF’s green energy targets and has declared that man-made global warming science is a scam.
In a statement announcing the new policy in the Swedish Parliament, Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson warned that the Scandinavian nation is switching to “a stable energy system.”
Svantesson warned that wind and solar power are too “unstable” to meet the nation’s energy requirements.
Slaynews.com reports: Instead, the Swedish Government is shifting back to nuclear power and has ditched its targets for a “100% renewable energy” supply.
The move is a major blow to unreliable and inefficient technology.
Countries are being pushed toward “renewable energy” to meet the goals of the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) green agenda.
The WEF’s green agenda is being heavily pushed by the United Nations, the World Health Organization (WHO), Paris Climate Agreement, World Bank, and Democrat President Joe Biden’s administration.
Announcing Sweden’s new policy, Svantesson said: “This creates the conditions for nuclear power.
“We need more electricity production, we need clean electricity and we need a stable energy system.”
Environmental campaign group Net Zero Watch has welcomed the move.
The group argues that the Swedish decision is “an important step in the right direction, implicitly acknowledging the low quality of unstable wind and solar, and is part of a general collapse of confidence in the renewable energy agenda pioneered in the Nordic countries and in Germany.”
Under its new direction, Sweden now views nuclear power as being critical to the nation’s “100% fossil-free” energy future.
Sweden can “afford to reject fossil fuels, relying on nuclear and hydro and biomass,” Net Zero Watch suggests.
Svantesson also sent a warning to other Western nations who are blindly pushing to meet the energy requirements of the WEF’s green agenda.
In “substantial industrialized economies… only a gas to the nuclear pathway is viable to remain industrialized and competitive,” Svantesson noted.
Experts have argued that lowering carbon dioxide emissions is not really a worthwhile goal for an individual country or globally.
The potential harms of the gas are uncertain and exaggerated while the benefits are overlooked.
Dr. John Constable, Net Zero Watch’s Energy Director, said that “living close to Russia focuses the mind.”
The Swedish people wish to “ground their economy in an energy source, nuclear, that is physically sound and secure, unlike renewables which are neither,” he explains.
Other world governments are continuing “to live in a fantasy” about meeting the green agenda goals, Constable added.
“But we are coming to the end of the green dream.”
SF Source The People’s Voice Jun 2023
I commend Sweden’s decision to take such a bold position. Hopefully many other nations will follow their example. I believe that the nuclear option is the best, but we can still use existing and proven reliable methods of producing electricity as well. It is very clear that it would help green the earth by increasing CO2 levels since man-made CO2 is only at about 3% of global CO2 levels and also given the fact that water vapor is the “elephant in the room” greenhouse gas, which makes CO2 insignificant. Additionally, everyone knows by now that it’s really the sun and evaporation of the water in the oceans forming clouds that are the major factors controlling global warming or cooling and climate change – which strangely have been omitted from the IPCC approved climate change computer model.