Anonymous Leaks to the WashPost About the CIA’s Russia Beliefs Are No Substitute for Evidence

evidenceGlenn Greenwald – The Washington Post late Friday night published an explosive story that, in many ways, is classic American journalism of the worst sort: The key claims are based exclusively on the unverified assertions of anonymous officials, who in turn are disseminating their own claims about what the CIA purportedly believes, all based on evidence that remains completely secret.

These unnamed sources told the Post that “the CIA has concluded in a secret assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump win the presidency, rather than just to undermine confidence in the U.S. electoral system.” The anonymous officials also claim that “intelligence agencies have identified individuals with connections to the Russian government who provided WikiLeaks with thousands of hacked emails” from both the DNC and John Podesta’s email account. Critically, none of the actual evidence for these claims is disclosed; indeed, the CIA’s “secret assessment” itself remains concealed.

A second leak from last night, this one given to the New York Times, cites other anonymous officials as asserting that “the Russians hacked the Republican National Committee’s computer systems in addition to their attacks on Democratic organizations, but did not release whatever information they gleaned from the Republican networks.” But that NYT story says that “it is also far from clear that Russia’s original intent was to support Mr. Trump, and many intelligence officials — and former officials in Mrs. Clinton’s campaign — believe that the primary motive of the Russians was to simply disrupt the campaign and undercut confidence in the integrity of the vote.”

Deep down in its article, the Post notes — rather critically — that “there were minor disagreements among intelligence officials about the agency’s assessment, in part because some questions remain unanswered.” Most importantly, the Post adds that “intelligence agencies do not have specific intelligence showing officials in the Kremlin ‘directing’ the identified individuals to pass the Democratic emails to WikiLeaks.” But the purpose of both anonymous leaks is to finger the Russian government for these hacks, acting with the motive to defeat Hillary Clinton.

Continue reading

The Ultimate Deception- What Happened To Humanity On Earth?

Noel Huntley, Ph.D. – If anyone takes a really good look at our world today they surely can hardly deny that there is something wrong with this picture. How many people question our state of evolution and its professed history? Unfortunately we can be programmed to view a negative existence as normal or natural. If we can observe these undesirable elements and recognise them as not part of a properly evolving world, then we can be sure the more realistic situation is one which is much worse. That is, the discrepancies are much greater. Programming can not only successfully brainwash anyone to think this way but can also underlie the most fundamental level of existence itself.

If all humans were born with one leg, this would appear normal—nothing strange about it. Nevertheless the inevitable mavericks, or individuals who manage to gain temporary freedom from the programming, would point out that two legs would be much better than one; or even bolder, that we had two legs at one time. Amazingly we would still find significant opposition and ridicule, for instance, that one leg would get in the way of the other.

Thus with this theme in mind, education, upbringing, the media, science of evolution, history, etc. have programmed society with the fundamental reference or context of the natural occurrence of a one-legged species. All the limitations arising from having one leg are perfectly normal. This is the important point, “All the limitations . . . are perfectly normal.”

Continue reading

Climatologist Breaks the Silence on Global Warming Groupthink [Video]

Dr. Judith Curry is Professor and former Chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Following is her verbal remarks as delivered to last week’s US Senate Commerce Committee Hearing on “Data or Dogma? Promoting Open Inquiry in the Debate Over the Magnitude of the Human Impact on Earth’s Climate.”

https://youtu.be/GujLcfdovE8

SF Source corbettreport  Dec 2015

Read transcript here

[widget id=”text-44″]