Loretta Lynch Used Alias Email Account While Attorney General

lynchChuck Ross – Like her predecessor, Eric Holder, former Attorney General Loretta Lynch used an email alias to conduct government business, The Daily Caller has confirmed.

Several of Lynch’s emails were included in 413 pages of DOJ documents provided to the conservative groups Judicial Watch and the American Center for Law and Justice. Both groups had filed lawsuits for records regarding Lynch’s controversial meeting with President Bill Clinton at the Phoenix airport last June 27.

Using the pseudonym “Elizabeth Carlisle,” Lynch corresponded with DOJ press officials to hammer out talking points in response to media requests about the meeting. The tarmac encounter drew criticism from conservatives because Lynch was overseeing the federal investigation into whether Hillary Clinton mishandled classified information on her private email system.

The meeting was revealed not by Lynch, Clinton or the Justice Department, but by a reporter in Phoenix working based on a tip. Continue reading

Gauntlet Thrown: House Judiciary Demands Special Counsel To Investigate Comey, Lynch, And Clinton

investigationZeroHedge.com – Roughly a month ago, we noted that Republicans might be well served to stop sitting around twiddling their thumbs waiting for the next Russia ‘bombshell’ to drop and actually go on the offensive against an ‘investigation’ that has obviously morphed into mass hysteria courtesy of free-flowing leaks from a conflicted “intelligence community” intent upon bringing down a presidency rather than finding out the truth.  Here’s what we said:

Of course, until someone within the Trump administration or Republican Party smartens up and calls for the appointment of a ‘Special Counsel’ to look into Hillary’s email scandal, something that should have been done long ago, and not for retaliatory reasons but simply due to Comey’s and AG Lynch’s blatant mishandling of the investigation (a point which Deputy AG Rosenstein obviously agreed with), the Democrats have no reason to calm their mass hysteria.  Then, and only then, do we suspect that Hillary might just be able to ‘convince’ her party to exercise some form of reasonable judgement.

Well, it seems that some folks on the House Judiciary Committee, chaired by Bob Goodlatte (R-VA), seem to agree.  As such, 20 Republican Representatives have sent a letter to Attorney General Sessions and Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein demanding the appointment of a Second Special Counsel to look into a laundry list of potential scandals surrounding Hillary Clinton, James Comey, Loretta Lynch and many others from the Obama administration. Continue reading

Republicans Are Going After James Comey and Loretta Lynch

investigationThomas – For months, conservatives have been wondering when action would be taken against former FBI Director James Comey and former Attorney General Loretta Lynch.

Now, the moment of action has arrived!

Four House Republicans have sponsored legislation to investigate them both. The amendment would allow the Justice Department to examine Hillary Clinton’s emails and the details behind the shamefully-weak investigation.

Now, the American people are about to learn just how compromised this Obama-era investigation was:

House conservatives will launch an effort to conduct an official House Judiciary Committee-led congressional investigation into former Attorney General Loretta Lynch and fired former FBI director James Comey, a notorious leaker, Breitbart News can confirm exclusively.

Reps. Matt Gaetz (R-FL), Andy Biggs (R-AZ), Mike Johnson (R-LA) and Jim Jordan (R-OH) have drafted an amendment that would compel government cooperation with a congressional probe into Lynch’s and Comey’s activities. Continue reading

Loretta Lynch Called To Testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee

lynchAmerican Patriot – Things keep getting worse for Loretta Lynch.

Former FBI Director James Comey dropped a bombshell that she interfered in the FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email server.

Now news is breaking that could land her in serious trouble.

After Comey’s testimony that Lynch had ordered him to refer to the Clinton investigation as a “matter” – so the FBI’s public statements would line up with the Clinton campaign’s talking points and downplay the seriousness of the investigation – calls heated up for a special prosecutor.

This came on the heels of reports that FBI Director Comey had gone public with his findings on the Clinton investigation because they were in possession of an email obtained by Russian hackers where one Democrat National Committee staffer claimed Lynch would take care of the investigation.

Senate Republicans immediately called for her to testify.

The New York Post reports:

“Members of the Senate Judiciary Committee are pressuring Chairman Chuck Grassley to ask former Attorney General Loretta Lynch to testify before the panel on whether she interfered with the Justice Department’s investigation of Hillary Clinton’s email server.

An aide to Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) told The Post on Monday that the Texas Republican wants Lynch to respond under oath to bipartisan concerns that she attempted to influence the Clinton probe – an explosive claim made by ousted FBI Director James Comey during his testimony last week.

Comey told senators that Lynch directed him to call the email probe a “matter” instead of an investigation, a move he said “confused and concerned” him.

“Cruz absolutely supports Lynch testifying before [the] Judiciary committee,” said Catherine Frazier, a spokeswoman for the Texas senator.”

But in even more troubling developments, Lynch’s conduct could become fodder for an obstruction of justice investigation for a special counsel.

Paul Sperry writes at The New York Post:

“The findings of the powerful panel, which has oversight of the Justice Department and FBI, could lead to a separate criminal investigation and the naming of another special counsel — exactly what Trump needs to distract attention from his growing legal woes.

What Lynch did reeks of obstruction. According to Comey, his ex-boss:

  •  Ordered him to mislead the public about the criminal investigation of Clinton by calling it a “matter” rather than an investigation. (He complied with her wish, even though it made him feel “queasy.”)
  •  Refused to recuse herself from the case after Comey confronted her about a secret June 2016 meeting she had with former President Bill Clinton — five days before his wife was scheduled to be interviewed by the FBI. (Hillary was cleared three days later.)

There are also concerns, raised by a New York Times report, that Lynch privately assured the Clinton campaign she would keep FBI agents in check and wouldn’t let their investigation “go too far,” according to a message the FBI intercepted involving then-Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz.”

It’s clear from all the available evidence and testimony that the real crimes – obstruction of justice, illegal surveillance, leaking of classified information – were committed by Obama administration officials.

Yet the special counsel is directing a witch hunt into Trump based on fake news stories spread by the so-called “mainstream” media.

The revelation of Lynch’s misconduct during the Clinton investigation could lead Trump to either appoint a special counsel to probe these allegations or have special counsel Mueller take up the inquiry.

We will keep you up to date on any new developments.

SF Source American Patriot Daily Jun 2017

So Let Me See If I Got This Right

informationKarl Denninger – There are some “five figures” of emails on a laptop that was seized from Weiner as part of a sexting minors across state lines investigation (which, I remind you, if it happened is a felony.)

Huma is married to (but now estranged from) Weiner.

The laptop belonged to Weiner.

Huma claims “she doesn’t know” how the emails got there and that she wasn’t a “regular user” of said laptop.

All of this is very important for several reasons:

1. Everyone involved in the original email investigation said that no other devices on which such material would be found existed.  That is, they all stated under penalty of perjury and under oath that they had turned over all such devices they had possession of and access to.

2. If any of those emails are classified then there is a separate and distinct offense involved from any original offense because said device was not in any way authorized to have such material on it, was not under control of the State Department (either directly or by proxy), was not managed under same and in fact it was claimed to not exist by everyone who testified they had turned over all devices on which such material did exist.

Continue reading